From: maxg@mellanox.com (Max Gurtovoy)
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] nvme-rdma: use reconnect_work for initial connect
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 17:10:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2d53def-3394-eaf3-c75c-d30f708454de@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821134329.69577-2-hare@suse.de>
On 8/21/2018 4:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The 'reconnect_work' function does exactly the same than we do
> for the initial connect, so we can as well schedule the workqueue
> item here and wait for it to complete.
If we do this we should rename it to connect_work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index dc042017c293..0906acbb800e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> @@ -1990,19 +1990,25 @@ static struct nvme_ctrl *nvme_rdma_create_ctrl(struct device *dev,
> changed = nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!changed);
>
> - ret = nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl(ctrl, true);
we call nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl with "new == true" here and with "new ==
false" in the reconnect work.
so how does this work ?
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_uninit_ctrl;
> -
> - dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device, "new ctrl: NQN \"%s\", addr %pISpcs\n",
> - ctrl->ctrl.opts->subsysnqn, &ctrl->addr);
> -
> nvme_get_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
>
> mutex_lock(&nvme_rdma_ctrl_mutex);
> list_add_tail(&ctrl->list, &nvme_rdma_ctrl_list);
> mutex_unlock(&nvme_rdma_ctrl_mutex);
>
> + if (!queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->reconnect_work, 0)) {
> + nvme_put_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
> + dev_err(ctrl->ctrl.device,
> + "failed to schedule initial connect\n");
> + goto out_uninit_ctrl;
> + }
> +
> + flush_delayed_work(&ctrl->reconnect_work);
> +
> + dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device, "new ctrl: NQN \"%s\", addr %pISpcs\n",
> + ctrl->ctrl.opts->subsysnqn, &ctrl->addr);
> +
> +
> return &ctrl->ctrl;
>
> out_uninit_ctrl:
>
what is the benefit here ?
We have more lines of code now :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-21 13:43 [RFC PATCH 0/4] nvme async-connect and discovery uevents Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme-rdma: use reconnect_work for initial connect Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 14:10 ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
2018-08-21 14:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: implement 'async_connect' cli option Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 21:01 ` James Smart
2018-08-21 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: implement 'discovery' sysfs entry and discovery uevents Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 21:01 ` James Smart
2018-08-22 7:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-22 8:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: delete discovery controller after 2 minutes Hannes Reinecke
2018-08-21 21:01 ` James Smart
2018-08-22 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2d53def-3394-eaf3-c75c-d30f708454de@mellanox.com \
--to=maxg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox