From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3C3CA0EFA for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xiNs42RT8JY287EqVp/Sj5aOw0z1IPc9RNKRq3M2mrY=; b=eAmZpcMwIjZ+cc8YDJTa5BccFZ dDdJup5INGABk8wHMV17uIIS/k+7saII7MAKId6jpf/rK4y9C/aidllvzBnbbcN1UYtqzh6BvkpFr m4Ik29Z4oNRZBDw6xKrvZBwk2iNrm+ZZ4y7iGHj1hKkeQb27kQEL2mQKUUXAoCFMBjhr1RYQskZn+ Da4mHTA9sey/dF9iyi9Khwi1NfEm7Vd5NC3egErz4tJv6AkGnS5EO9GQHVIe1Zr3S4WJDj8uyOCGR 0JPoKtX8oF5mKHZFiZWOV/DByrFr4L9Nuf6wrIb6y4egtC9fVBo3cwhFe4C4pubZyMtJmRz6qG3Vk 37Eo0KTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uquno-0000000CHzm-16Zz; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:37:36 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uquMe-0000000CCjZ-2CYg for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:09:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1756217370; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xiNs42RT8JY287EqVp/Sj5aOw0z1IPc9RNKRq3M2mrY=; b=HSUk983uX5Pj6b6RSIntBHkAMi/vSyDiEY6PKW5yYm6M4VYegpxboWo7bzlKgqAEmlSlW4 yjbga2nm/ddTL2bDfUVP1olFpoUXVUZhH6+i9HCK76kuCmn4TtZPhpirIfD0F6iS2Bj3e1 sYm7xwUxWNm834nK6xh9AVCpd7ne0Xc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-595-rTYn78kXMNOmC182-9CjOw-1; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:09:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rTYn78kXMNOmC182-9CjOw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: rTYn78kXMNOmC182-9CjOw_1756217367 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5021519560B0; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.17.17.65] (unknown [10.17.17.65]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E3919560AB; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:09:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libnvme: TLS PSK derivation fixes To: Hannes Reinecke , Daniel Wagner , Chris Leech Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Prashanth Nayak References: <20250721021718.1159879-1-cleech@redhat.com> <20250721021718.1159879-2-cleech@redhat.com> <3c3c3194-7275-4a77-9397-4c159458f2c5@suse.de> <3fc1b734-263e-4580-83f8-6852e72f198d@flourine.local> <61da6ec7-500e-4e33-a51a-d2f6ec9e08b6@suse.de> From: John Meneghini Organization: RHEL Core Storge Team In-Reply-To: <61da6ec7-500e-4e33-a51a-d2f6ec9e08b6@suse.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: YCyxmHzFFuro_Yip3mW53hssd-OGLNJjWgV6GBnOhWk_1756217367 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250826_070932_635420_7A2BC056 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 8/20/25 4:22 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 8/20/25 10:10, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:33:06PM -0700, Chris Leech wrote: >>> If we don't have a resolution by then, maybe this is something we can >>> resolve at ALPSS. >>> >>> [1] Side note; with nvme_fabrics_cfg _not_ being allocated through >>> libnvme, I don't see how the various additions there can be ABI safe. It >>> looks to me like this struct alone broke ABI in libnvme 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, >>> and 1.11. >> >> I know and I was hopping it wouldn't cause troubles... nvme_fabrics_cfg >> is a bit of a problem. I was planing to address this for v2. > > In a similar vein: shouldn't we have a session at ALPSS around > libnvme v2? Yes, both Chris and I have proposed a talk to discuss NVMe/TLS at ALPSS. > Or, if not a session, maybe a beer topic? Sure, you can drink a beer when we talk about it. ;-) /John > Cheers, > > Hannes