Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guixin Liu" <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmet: Handle a NULL admin queue in nvmet_queue_tls_keyid()
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 03:50:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-188683@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029034306.3626274-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] nvmet: UAF race in nvmet_queue_tls_keyid() during admin queue teardown
--

commit 7f7e86c9399b0b51dffaf7a9659e2eee6e379123
Author: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>

nvmet: Handle a NULL admin queue in nvmet_queue_tls_keyid()

This commit adds a NULL pointer check for sq in nvmet_queue_tls_keyid() to
avoid dereferencing a NULL admin queue when the tls_key debugfs entry is read
before the admin queue is created or after it is destroyed.

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> index 9cec19e6f4857..8bfc953b69f24 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> @@ -959,6 +959,8 @@ static inline void nvmet_req_bio_put(struct nvmet_req *req, struct bio *bio)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS
>  static inline key_serial_t nvmet_queue_tls_keyid(struct nvmet_sq *sq)
>  {
> +	if (!sq)
> +		return 0;
>  	return sq->tls_key ? key_serial(sq->tls_key) : 0;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does checking for a NULL sq here actually prevent a use-after-free when
nvmet_ctrl_tls_key_show() races with admin queue teardown?

In drivers/nvme/target/debugfs.c, nvmet_ctrl_tls_key_show() reads
ctrl->sqs[0] without holding any lock or reference pinning the queue or its
key:

static int nvmet_ctrl_tls_key_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
{
	struct nvmet_ctrl *ctrl = m->private;
	key_serial_t keyid = nvmet_queue_tls_keyid(ctrl->sqs[0]);

	seq_printf(m, "%08x\n", keyid);
	return 0;
}

Concurrently, during admin queue teardown in drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c,
nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work() releases the TLS key, destroys the sq, and
frees the queue:

	nvmet_sq_put_tls_key(&queue->nvme_sq);
	nvmet_tcp_uninit_data_in_cmds(queue);
	nvmet_sq_destroy(&queue->nvme_sq);
	nvmet_cq_put(&queue->nvme_cq);
	...
	kfree(queue);

where nvmet_sq_put_tls_key() drops the key reference before clearing
sq->tls_key:

static inline void nvmet_sq_put_tls_key(struct nvmet_sq *sq)
{
	if (sq->tls_key) {
		key_put(sq->tls_key);
		sq->tls_key = NULL;
	}
}

and nvmet_sq_destroy() in drivers/nvme/target/core.c only clears
sq->ctrl->sqs[sq->qid] afterwards:

	if (ctrl) {
		ctrl->reset_tbkas = true;
		sq->ctrl->sqs[sq->qid] = NULL;
		nvmet_ctrl_put(ctrl);
		sq->ctrl = NULL; /* allows reusing the queue later */
	}

Can this still lead to two use-after-free races when reading the tls_key
debugfs entry while the controller stays alive via other references on
ctrl->ref (such as I/O queues or the keep-alive timer)?

1. nvmet_sq_put_tls_key() runs before nvmet_sq_destroy() clears
   ctrl->sqs[0], and calls key_put(sq->tls_key) before setting
   sq->tls_key = NULL. If nvmet_ctrl_tls_key_show() runs concurrently,
   sq is still non-NULL, so can nvmet_queue_tls_keyid() dereference
   sq->tls_key in key_serial(sq->tls_key) while or after key_put() frees
   the struct key?

2. If nvmet_ctrl_tls_key_show() loads a non-NULL sq = ctrl->sqs[0] just
   before nvmet_sq_destroy() sets sq->ctrl->sqs[0] = NULL and
   nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work() calls kfree(queue), the !sq check in
   nvmet_queue_tls_keyid() will still see the non-NULL pointer and
   dereference sq->tls_key on the freed queue.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029034306.3626274-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29  3:43 [PATCH v2] nvmet: Handle a NULL admin queue in nvmet_queue_tls_keyid() Guixin Liu
2026-10-29  3:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-29 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-188683@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox