From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sreeraj S Kurup" <sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: reject invalid write-protect feature values
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 14:11:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205062@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109135536.2772-1-sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] nvmet: missing Fixes trailer for nvmet_set_feat_write_protect()
regression
--
commit a435e948ad0b0443cd38d58e0a87dcc11c315ea6
Author: Sreeraj S Kurup <sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com>
> nvmet: reject invalid write-protect feature values
>
> The Set Features handler for namespace write protection currently
> accepts unsupported values. The default case in the write-protect
> switch leaves the status unchanged, causing the command to return
> success even though no valid setting was applied.
>
> Return NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_STATUS_DNR for unsupported
> values. This also prevents issuing a namespace-change notification
> for an invalid request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sreeraj S Kurup <sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com>
[Severity: Low]
Commit 3a1f7c79ae6d ("nvmet: make nvmet_find_namespace() req based") removed
the initial error status assignment in nvmet_set_feat_write_protect(),
leaving status set to 0 after nvmet_req_find_ns() succeeds. Should this
include:
Fixes: 3a1f7c79ae6d ("nvmet: make nvmet_find_namespace() req based")
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109135536.2772-1-sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 13:55 [PATCH] nvmet: reject invalid write-protect feature values Sreeraj S Kurup
2026-11-09 14:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 14:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Sreeraj S Kurup
2026-11-10 7:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205062@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sreekuttan2156239@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox