From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] handshake: Add a kunit test for the completion gate
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:52:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213023@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-tls-session-tags-v2-6-a587a50de7fc@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] handshake: unrelated sessiontags KUnit changes squashed into
commit
--
commit b879c6737fc8615a84b7321f23d468457911d409
Author: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
handshake: Add a kunit test for the completion gate
This commit exports handshake_try_complete() and handshake_finish_complete()
for KUnit and adds a test case verifying completion gate exclusivity, along
with updates to the session-tag duplicate KUnit tests.
> diff --git a/net/handshake/handshake-test.c b/net/handshake/handshake-test.c
> index 21fccfa94d897..b6992d1fa4ce4 100644
> --- a/net/handshake/handshake-test.c
> +++ b/net/handshake/handshake-test.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -651,7 +729,7 @@ static void handshake_sessiontags_duplicate(struct kunit *test)
> info.nlhdr = nlh;
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, handshake_get_sessiontags(&tags, &info), 0);
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, stringset_count(&tags), 2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, stringset_count(&tags), 1);
> stringset_finalize(&tags);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, stringset_count(&tags), 1);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, stringset_is_member(&tags, "dup"));
> @@ -660,6 +738,30 @@ static void handshake_sessiontags_duplicate(struct kunit *test)
> kfree_skb(skb);
> }
>
> +static void handshake_sessiontags_duplicate_at_cap(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct genl_info info = {};
> + struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + DEFINE_STRINGSET(tags);
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + skb = handshake_done_msg(test, &nlh);
> + for (i = 0; i < HANDSHAKE_MAX_SESSIONTAGS; i++)
> + nla_put_string(skb, HANDSHAKE_A_DONE_TAG, "dup");
> + nla_put_string(skb, HANDSHAKE_A_DONE_TAG, "last");
> + nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
> + info.nlhdr = nlh;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, handshake_get_sessiontags(&tags, &info), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, stringset_count(&tags), 2);
> + stringset_finalize(&tags);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, stringset_is_member(&tags, "last"));
> +
> + stringset_destroy(&tags);
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -755,6 +861,10 @@ static struct kunit_case handshake_api_test_cases[] = {
> .name = "sessiontags duplicate",
> .run_case = handshake_sessiontags_duplicate,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "sessiontags duplicates at cap",
> + .run_case = handshake_sessiontags_duplicate_at_cap,
> + },
> {
> .name = "sessiontags truncate at cap",
> .run_case = handshake_sessiontags_truncate,
[Severity: Low]
Were these session-tag duplicate KUnit changes meant to be folded into
the preceding commit "handshake: Pick up session tags passed during the
DONE downcall"?
In that commit, handshake_get_sessiontags() already skips duplicate tags
via handshake_sessiontag_is_dup(), so handshake_sessiontags_duplicate()
fails its stringset_count(&tags) == 2 check until this commit updates it,
and the commit message here only describes the completion gate test.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-tls-session-tags-v2-0-a587a50de7fc@kernel.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:52 [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] Deliver TLS session tags to upper-layer consumers (NFSD) Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] handshake: Add tags to "done" downcall Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] lib: Add a "stringset" data structure Chuck Lever
2026-11-13 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/10] lib: Add KUnit tests for the stringset " Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] handshake: Add a session-tags argument to the TLS done callback Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/10] handshake: Pick up session tags passed during the DONE downcall Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] handshake: Add a kunit test for the completion gate Chuck Lever
2026-11-13 14:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/10] handshake: Advertise the session-tag cap to user space Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] SUNRPC: Copy the TLS session tags when they are available Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/10] NFSD: Implement export tagging Chuck Lever
2026-11-12 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] NFSD: Add allow_tags to the netlink export interface Chuck Lever
2026-11-13 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213023@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox