From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mohamed Khalfella" <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/17] nvme-fc: perform error recovery directly from ioerr_work
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 03:31:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214114@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114030454.2836543-14-mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] nvme-fc: race between nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work() and controller
deletion
- [Low] nvme-fc: unused forward declaration of
__nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios()
--
commit f47f39335cf25a25520dc165768b29ed4e1e01c4
Author: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
nvme-fc: perform error recovery directly from ioerr_work
This commit replaces nvme_fc_error_recovery() with direct association
teardown, controller stop, and reconnect scheduling inside
nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work().
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> index c4603be381445..0ba621649afed 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static struct device *fc_udev_device;
> static void nvme_fc_complete_rq(struct request *rq);
> static void nvme_fc_start_ioerr_recovery(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl,
> char *errmsg);
> +static void __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl,
> + bool start_queues);
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but nothing calls __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios()
before its definition now that nvme_fc_error_recovery() is removed, so this
forward declaration is unused.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1880,7 +1883,23 @@ nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl =
> container_of(work, struct nvme_fc_ctrl, ioerr_work);
>
> - nvme_fc_error_recovery(ctrl, "transport detected io error");
> + nvme_stop_keep_alive(&ctrl->ctrl);
> + flush_work(&ctrl->ctrl.async_event_work);
> +
> + /* will block while waiting for io to terminate */
> + nvme_fc_delete_association(ctrl);
> + nvme_stop_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
> +
> + /* Do not reconnect if controller is being deleted */
> + if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING))
> + return;
> +
> + if (ctrl->rport->remoteport.port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE) {
> + queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->connect_work, 0);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete(ctrl, -ENOTCONN);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work() race with controller deletion and re-arm
ctrl->connect_work after nvme_fc_delete_ctrl() has already canceled it?
Previously, error recovery called nvme_reset_ctrl(), and
nvme_do_delete_ctrl() flushed ctrl->reset_work before calling
nvme_stop_ctrl(), nvme_remove_namespaces(), and ctrl->ops->delete_ctrl().
Unlike rdma and tcp, nvme_fc_ctrl_ops does not implement .stop_ctrl to
flush ioerr_work, and nvme_fc_delete_ctrl() cancels connect_work before
canceling ioerr_work:
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c:nvme_fc_delete_ctrl() {
...
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ctrl->connect_work);
...
nvme_fc_delete_association(ctrl);
cancel_work_sync(&ctrl->ioerr_work);
...
}
If controller deletion starts right after nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work() moves
the controller to NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING, connect_work can be queued after
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ctrl->connect_work) has already completed:
CPU0 CPU1
nvme_fc_ctrl_ioerr_work()
...
nvme_change_ctrl_state(...,
NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING)
nvme_delete_ctrl()
nvme_change_ctrl_state(...,
NVME_CTRL_DELETING)
...
nvme_do_delete_ctrl()
...
nvme_fc_delete_ctrl()
cancel_delayed_work_sync(
&ctrl->connect_work)
...
cancel_work_sync(
&ctrl->ioerr_work)
queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq,
&ctrl->connect_work, 0)
nvme_remove_io_tag_set()
nvme_remove_admin_tag_set()
nvme_uninit_ctrl()
nvme_fc_connect_ctrl_work()
nvme_fc_create_association()
<-- use-after-free
This leaves connect_work running nvme_fc_create_association() while the
tag sets are torn down and struct nvme_fc_ctrl is freed.
In addition, because nvme_do_delete_ctrl() does not wait for ioerr_work
before calling nvme_remove_namespaces(), nvme_fc_delete_association() in
ioerr_work can run concurrently with nvme_remove_namespaces(), racing on
quiescing and unquiescing the I/O queues while scan_work is flushed and
hardware queues are deleted.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114030454.2836543-1-mkhalfella@purestorage.com?part=13
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 3:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] TP8028 Rapid Path Failure Recovery Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] nvmet: Rapid Path Failure Recovery set controller identify fields Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] nvmet/debugfs: Export controller CIU and CIRN via debugfs Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] nvmet: Implement CCR nvme command Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] nvmet: Implement CCR logpage Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] nvmet: Send an AEN on CCR completion Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] nvme: Rapid Path Failure Recovery read controller identify fields Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] nvme: Introduce FENCING and FENCED controller states Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] nvme: Implement cross-controller reset recovery Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] nvme: Implement cross-controller reset completion Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] nvme-tcp: Use CCR to recover controller that hits an error Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] nvme-rdma: " Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] nvme-fc: start error recovery instead of aborting timed out IOs Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] nvme-fc: perform error recovery directly from ioerr_work Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] nvme-fc: Use CCR to recover controller that hits an error Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] nvme-fc: Hold inflight requests while in FENCING state Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] nvmet: Add support for CQT to nvme target Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-14 3:04 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] nvme: Add support for CQT to nvme host Mohamed Khalfella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214114@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox