From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <qiliang.yuan@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] nvme-multipath: apply delayed_removal_secs changes to a pending removal
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 02:36:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-215189@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114-bug-nvme-mpath-set-live-srcu-v3-1-d84651de6334@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] nvme-multipath: race in delayed_removal_secs_store() re-arms
remove_work
--
commit 92bcf5100d1d5ed726ca5da1431d5f936dbea0e9
Author: Qiliang Yuan <qiliang.yuan@linux.dev>
nvme-multipath: apply delayed_removal_secs changes to a pending removal
This commit cancels and requeues any pending head->remove_work when
delayed_removal_secs is written via sysfs so the updated delay takes
effect immediately.
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> index ae8059366b57d..35278b9c4de60 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
> @@ -1242,6 +1242,9 @@ static ssize_t delayed_removal_secs_store(struct device *dev,
> mutex_lock(&head->subsys->lock);
> head->delayed_removal_secs = sec;
> assign_bit(NVME_NSHEAD_QUEUE_IF_NO_PATH, &head->flags, sec);
> + /* Apply the new delay to a removal that is already pending */
> + if (cancel_delayed_work(&head->remove_work))
> + queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &head->remove_work, sec * HZ);
[Severity: Medium]
Can this race with nvme_init_ns_head() and re-arm head->remove_work after
a path has reconnected?
drivers/nvme/host/core.c:nvme_init_ns_head() {
...
list_add_tail_rcu(&ns->siblings, &head->list);
ns->head = head;
mutex_unlock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH
if (cancel_delayed_work(&head->remove_work))
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
#endif
}
nvme_init_ns_head() adds the new namespace to head->list under
subsys->lock, but cancels head->remove_work after dropping the lock. If
delayed_removal_secs_store() runs in between, it clears the pending bit on
head->remove_work before nvme_init_ns_head() checks it, and then requeues
the work:
CPU0 CPU1
nvme_alloc_ns()
nvme_init_ns_head()
mutex_lock(&subsys->lock)
list_add_tail_rcu(..., &head->list)
mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock)
delayed_removal_secs_store()
mutex_lock(&subsys->lock)
cancel_delayed_work(&head->remove_work)
(returns true)
cancel_delayed_work(&head->remove_work)
(returns false)
queue_delayed_work(..., &head->remove_work, ...)
mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock)
...
out_unlink_ns:
nvme_put_ns_head(ns->head) <-- frees head with remove_work queued
This leaves head->remove_work pending while a path is on head->list. If
nvme_alloc_ns() then fails and takes its out_unlink_ns error path, it
drops both references and frees head while head->remove_work is still
queued on nvme_wq, causing a use-after-free when the work runs.
Checking list_empty(&head->list) under head->subsys->lock before
cancelling and requeuing head->remove_work (or moving the cancel in
nvme_init_ns_head() inside subsys->lock) would avoid this race.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114-bug-nvme-mpath-set-live-srcu-v3-0-d84651de6334@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 2:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme-multipath: requeue work fixes Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-15 2:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] nvme-multipath: apply delayed_removal_secs changes to a pending removal Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-15 2:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-15 2:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-multipath: don't wait for a grace period in nvme_mpath_set_live() Qiliang Yuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-215189@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=qiliang.yuan@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox