From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Moritz Hiller" <m.hiller@pc-heini.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] nvme-pci: NVMe lost after S3 resume, CSTS reads all-ones for a few 100 ms
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 02:39:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-215190@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <598ee2b4-32aa-4ad3-99c7-db7f9a7e7736@pc-heini.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] nvme-pci: missing Signed-off-by trailer and RFC email commit
message
--
commit ba0016eb2b4fe54e7c1345a47b1af60d7461f91e
Author: Moritz Hiller <m.hiller@pc-heini.de>
> nvme-pci: NVMe lost after S3 resume, CSTS reads all-ones for a few 100 ms
>
> Hi,
>
> on my desktop the root NVMe drive sporadically does not come back after
> S3 resume (roughly 5-10% of resumes in automated runs):
>
> nvme nvme0: Disabling device after reset failure: -19
>
> The single readl(CSTS) in nvme_pci_enable() returns all-ones about
> 200 ms after resume. The controller is not dead, it just needs a few
> hundred ms more. A small wait loop (diff below) fixes it here, tested
> on CachyOS kernels and on vanilla v7.4-rc2. I am not asking for the
> diff to be merged as is, I would like to know where this should be
> fixed properly.
>
> System:
> - ASUS ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (BIOS 5044), Ryzen 7 5800X, S3 (deep)
> - Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB [144d:a810], FW 0B2QNXH7, at 0000:01:00.0,
> directly behind root port 0000:00:01.1 [1022:1483]
>
> Observations:
> - pci_pm_resume_noirq takes ~0.3 ms for the SSD, config space answers.
> - At the failing CSTS read config space is intact, the link is up
> (16 GT/s x4), the device is in D0, no AER errors:
>
> vendor=144d cmd=0006 (saved 0002) bar0=fcf00004 (saved fcf00004)
> pmcsr=0008 lnksta=1044 rp_lnksta=3044
>
> - sysfs remove + rescan brings the drive back after ~3 s.
> - ASPM is off on this link, pcie_aspm=off and
> nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 make no difference.
> - Unpatched, 2 of 15 and 2 of 24 cycles failed in automated runs
> (90 s sleep, RTC wake). With the wait, no cycle failed (30/30 on
> CachyOS, 15/15 on v7.4-rc2); the controller answered after
> 200-400 ms whenever the wait triggered.
>
> My reading: pci_power_up() finds PMCSR already in D0 and does not
> wait, and pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() only runs after D3cold
> and only checks config space. So nothing waits for MMIO to come back,
> and nvme_pci_enable() gives up on the first all-ones read.
>
> The diff polls CSTS every 100 ms for up to 10 s, only if
> NVME_CC_SHN_NORMAL is still set (the was_suspend test in
> nvme_reset_work()) and while pci_device_is_present(). Probe and
> runtime resets are unchanged. Known downsides:
> - The 10 s bound is arbitrary.
> - It also triggers on thaw/restore after hibernation (same bit set).
> - The wait sleeps with shutdown_lock held, as nvme_wait_ready() already
> does in the same call chain.
> - A controller that answers config space but is really dead after
> resume is declared dead 10 s later than today.
> - A wait that times out is not logged.
>
> Should this go into nvme-pci, the PCI core, or a quirk for this board
> or drive? I can provide lspci -vvv, full dmesg or test patches.
>
> The problem has existed on this machine for about a year, possibly
> also with the previous SSD in this slot. It was hard to pin down: when
> it happens the root filesystem is gone, so nothing gets written to
> disk. I only got the first log of a failure in August 2026 via
> netconsole, and every failure captured since then looks the same.
>
> Disclosure: I am not a kernel developer. Log analysis, code reading
> and the diff were done with an LLM assistant (Claude); I ran all tests
> on my hardware. I can send patch with Signed-off-by if useful.
>
> Thanks,
> Moritz Hiller
>
> ---8<--- proof of concept, against v7.3.4 ---8<---
[Severity: High]
This commit is missing a Signed-off-by trailer certifying the Developer
Certificate of Origin. The commit message is also formatted as a mailing
list bug report and inquiry rather than a standard kernel commit changelog,
with conversational notes that should be moved below the "---" separator if
submitted as a patch.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/598ee2b4-32aa-4ad3-99c7-db7f9a7e7736@pc-heini.de?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 2:24 [bug report] nvme-pci: NVMe lost after S3 resume, CSTS reads all-ones for a few 100 ms Moritz Hiller
2026-11-15 2:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-215190@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.hiller@pc-heini.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox