From: martin.petersen@oracle.com (Martin K. Petersen)
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: Set physical block size and optimal I/O size according to NVMe 1.4
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:53:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq15zpa2que.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610210612.103952-4-bvanassche@acm.org> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:06:12 -0700")
Bart,
> + nawupf = (1 + ns->ctrl->subsys->awupf) * bs;
> + if (id->nsfeat & (1 << 1))
> + nawupf = (1 + id->nawupf) * bs;
This tripped me up a bit. I would have preferred an else statement and
maybe a clarifying comment to make it obvious whether the value comes
from the controller or the namespace.
Also, unlike awupf, nawupf is not a 0-based value (0 means "use awupf"
and not 1 logical block).
And finally, I think it's confusing that you use nawupf for the variable
name post modification. In terms of naming, I think you'd be better off
to do s/nawupf/phys_bs/ or atomic_bs. And then rename your existing
phys_bs variable to io_min to match the existing block layer usage.
So something like:
/* Use reported namespace write atomicity */
if (id->nsfeat & (1 << 1) && id->nawupf != 0)
phys_bs = id->nawupf * bs;
else /* Fall back to reported controller write atomicity */
phys_bs = (1 + ns->ctrl->subsys->awupf) * bs;
[...]
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 21:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace Support Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] nvme: Introduce NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace fields in struct nvme_id_ns Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] nvmet: Export NVMe namespace attributes Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 4:42 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 17:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 17:53 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 23:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: Set physical block size and optimal I/O size according to NVMe 1.4 Bart Van Assche
2019-06-13 1:53 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-06-13 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-13 23:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq15zpa2que.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox