From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: martin.petersen@oracle.com (Martin K. Petersen)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 18:11:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] IB/isert: fix T10-pi check mask setting
In-Reply-To: <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com> (Jason Gunthorpe's message
 of "Tue, 29 May 2018 13:23:29 -0600")
References: <1527436222-15494-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com>
 <1527436222-15494-2-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com>
 <20180528072130.GB5618@lst.de>
 <452bfcde-ee3c-a4e5-e2d0-43114099590a@mellanox.com>
 <20180528120359.GA13368@lst.de>
 <99191c8c-b03e-f40d-ffd9-a73e01d0ae2a@mellanox.com>
 <20180528163324.GF17491@mellanox.com> <yq1o9gz2mi1.fsf@oracle.com>
 <6c7335c1-1d59-f764-be46-9aab46eb8458@mellanox.com>
 <20180529192329.GJ18442@mellanox.com>
Message-ID: <yq1a7si15a1.fsf@oracle.com>


Jason,

>> we must wait until Martin PR for sure...
>
> Hmm, maybe we should have sent this patch through rdma in that
> case.. The merge window is soon anyhow so it doesn't really matter
> this time - but you need to think about what tree patches need to go
> to when building your patch plan, don't just send a large unstructured
> series like this and expect the maintainers to figure out all the
> dependencies!

I am also happy to just drop the patch from scsi-fixes and you can
funnel everything through RDMA. Doesn't matter to me.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering