public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Cc: <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <hare@suse.de>,
	<kbusch@kernel.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <oren@nvidia.com>,
	<oevron@nvidia.com>, <israelr@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-multipath: fix path failover for integrity ns
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:12:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1jzy0lnyl.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230424225442.18916-3-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> (Max Gurtovoy's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:54:42 +0300")


Hi Max!

> In case the integrity capabilities of the failed path and the failover
> path don't match, we may run into NULL dereference. Free the integrity
> context during the path failover and let the block layer prepare it
> again if needed during bio_submit.

This assumes that the protection information is just an ephemeral
checksum. However, that is not always the case. The application may
store values in the application or storage tags which must be returned
on a subsequent read.

In addition, in some overseas markets (financial, government), PI is a
regulatory requirement. It would be really bad for us to expose a device
claiming PI support and then it turns out the protection isn't actually
always active.

DM multipathing doesn't allow mismatched integrity profiles. I don't
think NVMe should either.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix failover to non integrity NVMe path Max Gurtovoy
2023-04-24 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] block: bio-integrity: export bio_integrity_free func Max Gurtovoy
2023-04-24 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-multipath: fix path failover for integrity ns Max Gurtovoy
2023-04-25  2:12   ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2023-04-25 10:24     ` Max Gurtovoy
2023-04-25 22:39       ` Keith Busch
2023-04-26  1:22       ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq1jzy0lnyl.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oevron@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox