public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "shekhar, chandra" <x0044955@ti.com>
To: "\"Högander\" Jouni" <jouni.hogander@nokia.com>,
	"ext Rajendra Nayak" <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] I2C re-init for every cmd
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:03:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002201c913f9$e86ecdd0$LocalHost@wipultra806> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87sks79exx.fsf@trdhcp146196.ntc.nokia.com

Hi,

Few comments inlined.

Regards,
Chandra
----- Original Message ----- 
From: ""Högander" Jouni" <jouni.hogander@nokia.com>
To: "ext Rajendra Nayak" <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] I2C re-init for every cmd


"ext Rajendra Nayak" <rnayak@ti.com> writes:

> This patch does i2c init/re-init for every transfer
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-omap-2.6/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c 2008-09-01
> 18:11:28.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-omap-2.6/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c 2008-09-01 18:11:52.000000000
> +0530
> @@ -496,6 +496,8 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>
>  omap_i2c_unidle(dev);
>
> + omap_i2c_init(dev);
> +
>  if ((r = omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev)) < 0)
>  goto out;

This is causing unacceptable delays on i2c transfers. This is because
occasionally reset loop in init function enters msleep. Is it
necessary to reset i2c controller after off-mode?

Any opinions on this:

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 3778735..4a27035 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -126,6 +126,14 @@
 /* I2C System Configuration Register (OMAP_I2C_SYSC): */
 #define OMAP_I2C_SYSC_SRST             (1 << 1)        /* Soft Reset */

+struct omap3_i2c_regs {
+       u16 sysc;
+       u16 psc;
+       u16 scll;
+       u16 sclh;
+       u16 buf;
+};
+



We can add this as a part of controller structure itself instaed of creating a 
new structure. we will store this
psc, scll and others as a part of controller and just restore it. That way we 
can do away with  omap3_i2c_save_context every time in clk disable.





 struct omap_i2c_dev {
        struct device           *dev;
        void __iomem            *base;          /* virtual */
@@ -147,6 +155,9 @@ struct omap_i2c_dev {
        unsigned                b_hw:1;         /* bad h/w fixes */
        unsigned                idle:1;
        u16                     iestate;        /* Saved interrupt register */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX
+       struct omap3_i2c_regs   context;
+#endif



I guess this should work for all the platforms. at least for omap2/3 it should 
work w/o any hiccups.
I2C_BUF is the only register which will require cpu check..so while restoring we 
can put that check for 2430/34xx.


 };



 static inline void omap_i2c_write_reg(struct omap_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
@@ -160,6 +171,26 @@ static inline u16 omap_i2c_read_reg(struct omap_i2c_dev 
*i2c_dev, int reg)
        return __raw_readw(i2c_dev->base + reg);
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX
+void omap3_i2c_save_context(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+       dev->context.sysc = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG);
+       dev->context.psc = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG);
+       dev->context.scll = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG);
+       dev->context.sclh = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG);
+       dev->context.buf = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG);
+}
+


+void omap3_i2c_restore_context(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+       omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, dev->context.sysc);
+       omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, dev->context.psc);
+       omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG, dev->context.scll);
+       omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG, dev->context.sclh);
+       omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG, dev->context.buf);
+}
+#endif
+

 static int __init omap_i2c_get_clocks(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
 {
        if (cpu_is_omap16xx() || cpu_class_is_omap2()) {
@@ -210,6 +241,10 @@ static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
                clk_enable(dev->iclk);
        clk_enable(dev->fclk);
        dev->idle = 0;
+
+       if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
+               omap3_i2c_restore_context(dev);
+
        if (dev->iestate)
                omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG, dev->iestate);
 }
@@ -344,6 +379,10 @@ static int omap_i2c_init(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
                        OMAP_I2C_IE_ARDY | OMAP_I2C_IE_NACK |
                        OMAP_I2C_IE_AL)  | ((dev->fifo_size) ?
                                (OMAP_I2C_IE_RDR | OMAP_I2C_IE_XDR) : 0));
+
+       if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
+               omap3_i2c_save_context(dev);
+



this will become redundant as data will be part of controller structure.


        return 0;
 }

@@ -496,8 +535,6 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg 
msgs[], int num)

        omap_i2c_unidle(dev);

-       omap_i2c_init(dev);
-


instead of calling restore from clk_enable we can replace omap_i2c_init by 
omap3_i2c_restore_context. that way clock enable code will be clean.



        if ((r = omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev)) < 0)
                goto out;

-- 
Jouni Högander

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-11 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-01 13:38 [PATCH 04/12] I2C re-init for every cmd Rajendra Nayak
2008-09-11 10:04 ` Högander Jouni
2008-09-11 10:33   ` shekhar, chandra [this message]
2008-09-11 11:01     ` Högander Jouni
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-11 15:55 chandra shekhar
2008-09-12  7:48 ` Högander Jouni
2008-09-15  6:57   ` shekhar, chandra
2008-09-16  9:25   ` Kevin Hilman
2008-09-16 10:13     ` Högander Jouni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002201c913f9$e86ecdd0$LocalHost@wipultra806' \
    --to=x0044955@ti.com \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox