Re: [Resending - PATCH 1/3] Triton BCI driver board/device setup for OMAP3430

["Madhusudhan Chikkature" <madhu.cr@ti.com>]

Hi Felipe,

> Tony, weird that we still have these prototypes in these headers.
> Could be some merging conflict ?
Yes. I see that these prototypes are still present in the board3430 and board2430 header files in the omap tree.

> Anyways, please apply the attached patch. We're using
> usb_musb_init() and usb_ehci_init() now.
You mean I should apply the attached patch you sent for local use, right? And I guess I dont need to resend this perticular BCI patch, am I correct?

Regards,
Madhu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Felipe Balbi" <me@felipebalbi.com>
To: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "Madhusudhan Chikkature" <madhu.cr@ti.com>; <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; <Mikko.K.Ylinen@nokia.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Resending - PATCH 1/3] Triton BCI driver board/device setup for OMAP3430


> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:25:33 +0530 (IST), "Madhusudhan Chikkature"
> <madhu.cr@ti.com> wrote:
>>  extern void sdp3430_usb_init(void);
> 
> Tony, weird that we still have these prototypes in these headers.
> Could be some merging conflict ?
> 
> Anyways, please apply the attached patch. We're using
> usb_musb_init() and usb_ehci_init() now.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Felipe Balbi
> http://blog.felipebalbi.com
> me@felipebalbi.com