From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Madhusudhan" Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor autoloading feature Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:20:17 -0500 Message-ID: <004501caed38$03e7b9f0$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:40723 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753985Ab0EFQUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 12:20:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "'Shilimkar, Santosh'" , 'kishore kadiyala' Cc: "'S, Venkatraman'" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, 'Adrian Hunter' , "'Kadiyala, Kishore'" , 'Tony Lindgren' > -----Original Message----- > From: Shilimkar, Santosh [mailto:santosh.shilimkar@ti.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:39 AM > To: kishore kadiyala > Cc: S, Venkatraman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; Chikkature Rajashekar, > Madhusudhan; Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; Tony Lindgren > Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor > autoloading feature > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: kishore kadiyala [mailto:kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:32 PM > > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > > Cc: S, Venkatraman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux- > mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > > kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan; > Adrian Hunter; Kadiyala, Kishore; > > Tony Lindgren > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] omap hsmmc: adaptation of sdma descriptor > autoloading feature > > > > <> > > > > >> I am not clear about the method. The board files export the > > >> omap_mmc_platform_data. > > >> Does it imply that all board files have to change and export > > >> the capability so that it can be queried ? > > > No. You don't have to modify the board files. This would need > > > change in devices.c which common for all omap boards. > > > > > > I don't have a strong opinion on this point but just put forth an > > > alternate way to avoid such SOC specific check in drivers. > > > You can take call on this > > > > Agree. How about adding a flag in hsmmc.h & omap_mmc_platform_data, > > that would take care of SDMA & SDMA_DLAOD in the driver instead going > > with SOC check . > > Good idea Kishore. > Venkat, > Can you do what kishore is suggesting. > omap_mmc_platform_data is MMC specific platform data. Why add a SDMA specific feature capability into it? Even though you add it there, you will still need to have a cpu check before that can be set in a common code. > Regards, > Santosh