From: "Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@ti.com>
To: 'Dirk Behme' <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, 'John Rigby' <jcrigby@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, 'Steve Sakoman' <sakoman@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:14:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004701ca4ea5$aeacefe0$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD8C959.1000004@googlemail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:28 PM
> To: Madhusudhan Chikkature
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; John Rigby; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> Steve Sakoman
> Subject: Re: MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430
>
> Madhusudhan Chikkature wrote:
> > Hi Dirk,
> >
> > I am inlining the patch so that it helps review.
> ...
> > @@ -1165,8 +1178,15 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mm
> > break;
> > case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
> > OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
> > - OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
> > - OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL) | FOUR_BIT);
> > + if (mmc_card_sdio(host->mmc->card)) {
> >
> > I wish it could be moved to "enable_sdio_irq" so that we can avoid
> inclusion of
> > card.h and checking the type of card in the host controller driver.
>
> Yes, this would be the real clean way. But ...
>
> > But the
> > dependancy on 4-bit seems to be a problem here.
>
> ... most probably we have to find a workaround until (if ever?) above
> clean implementation is available.
>
> What we need is after SDIO mode and bus width is known, and before the
> first interrupt comes, to set IBG.
>
> > On the problems being discussed on testing is the interrupt source
> geting
> > cleared at the SDIO card level upon genaration of the CIRQ? If not it
> remains
> > asserted.
>
> Yes, this seems to be exactly the problem John reports in his follow
> up mail.
>
> Any hint how to clear SDIO interrupt?
>
On the controller side I guess it is cleared when you pass "disable" in the
enable_sdio_irq" fn. This happens when you call mmc_signal_sdio_irq.
I am not too sure about how it gets disabled from the card side. I see that
SDIO core has a function "sdio_release_irq" which is used by the sdio uart
driver. The usage of this could give a clue.
Regards,
Madhu
> Many thanks
>
> Dirk
>
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
> > + | IBG | FOUR_BIT);
> > + } else {
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
> > + | FOUR_BIT);
> > + }
> > break;
> > case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1:
> > OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
> > @@ -1512,6 +1532,24 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk(struc
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int
> enable)
> > +{
> > + struct omap_hsmmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > + u32 ie, ise;
> > +
> > + ise = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE);
> > + ie = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE);
> > +
> > + if (enable) {
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise | CIRQ_ENABLE);
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, ie | CIRQ_ENABLE);
> > + } else {
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
> > + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, ie & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
> > + }
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ops = {
> > .enable = omap_hsmmc_enable_fclk,
> > .disable = omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk,
> > @@ -1519,7 +1557,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
> > .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
> > .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
> > .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
> > - /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
> > + .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ps_ops = {
> > @@ -1529,7 +1567,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
> > .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
> > .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
> > .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
> > - /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
> > + .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
> > };
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > @@ -1734,7 +1772,7 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struc
> > mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size;
> >
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> > - MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
> > + MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
> >
> > if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> John Rigby wrote:
> >>> I have seen several discussions about lack of sdio irq support in the
> >>> hsmmc driver but no patches. Has anyone on this list implemented this
> >>> and/or can anyone point me to patches?
> >> What a coincidence ;)
> >>
> >> I'm currently working on this. See attachment what I currently have.
> >> It is compile tested only against recent omap linux head. I don't have
> >> a board using SDIO at the moment, so no real testing possible :(
> >>
> >> Some background, maybe it helps people to step in:
> >>
> >> Gumstix OMAP3 based Overo air board connects Marvell 88W8686 wifi by
> >> MMC port 2 in 4 bit configuration [1]. The wifi performance is quite
> >> bad (~100kB/s). There is some rumor that this might be SDIO irq
> >> related [2]. There was an attempt to fix this [3] already, but this
> >> doesn't work [4]. Having this, I started to look into it.
> >>
> >> I used [3], the TI Davinci driver [5] (supporting SDIO irq), the SDIO
> >> Simplified Specification [6] and the OMAP35x TRM [7] as starting
> points.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, the Davinci MMC registers and irqs are different
> >> (Davinci has a dedicated SDIO irq). But combining [3] and [5] helps to
> >> get an idea what has to be done.
> >>
> >> I think the main issues of [3] were that it doesn't enable IBG for 4
> >> bit mode ([6] chapter 8.1.2) and that mmc_omap_irq() doesn't reset the
> >> irq bits.
> >>
> >> Topics I still open:
> >>
> >> - Is it always necessary to deal with IE _and_ ISE register? I'm not
> >> totally clear what the difference between these two registers are ;)
> >> And in which order they have to be set.
> >>
> >> - Davinci driver [5] in line 1115 checks for data line to call
> >> mmc_signal_sdio_irq() for irq enable.
> >>
> >> - Davinci driver deals with SDIO in xfer_done() (line 873)
> >>
> >> - Davinci driver sets block size to 64 if SDIO in line 701
> >>
> >> It would be quite nice if anybody likes to comment on attachment and
> >> help testing.
> >>
> >> Many thanks and best regards
> >>
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >> [1] http://gumstix.net/wiki/index.php?title=Overo_Wifi
> >>
> >> [2] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/14e822778c5eeb56
> >>
> >> [3] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/d0eb69f4c20673be
> >>
> >> [4] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/5cdfe2a319531937
> >>
> >> [5]
> >> http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-
> davinci.git;a=blob;f=drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c;h=1bf0587250614c6d8abf
> e02028b96e0e47148ac8;hb=HEAD
> >>
> >> [6] http://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/sdio/sd_bluetooth_spec/
> >>
> >> [7] http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/spruf98c/spruf98c.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-16 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-15 20:30 MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ for omap 3430 John Rigby
2009-10-16 7:16 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 13:43 ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 15:02 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 15:59 ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 16:06 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 18:51 ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 19:55 ` Dirk Behme
[not found] ` <4b73d43f0910161337k24908c7bjf5d84a90efb27bef@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-16 20:39 ` John Rigby
2009-10-16 17:43 ` Madhusudhan Chikkature
2009-10-16 19:28 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-16 21:14 ` Madhusudhan [this message]
2009-10-16 21:26 ` John Rigby
2009-10-17 6:30 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-17 15:12 ` John Rigby
2009-10-17 17:36 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-17 18:08 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-18 16:44 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-18 23:12 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-10-19 0:17 ` John Rigby
[not found] ` <4b73d43f0910181724q11d40851wb2aed801d7ae85f6@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-19 17:27 ` Madhusudhan
[not found] ` <005101ca50e1$11ef2770$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
2009-10-19 18:10 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-19 18:16 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20 22:47 ` Madhusudhan
2009-10-20 22:59 ` John Rigby
2009-10-21 17:46 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-21 17:44 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20 1:13 ` John Rigby
2009-10-20 2:53 ` Woodruff, Richard
[not found] ` <4b73d43f0910191439o30fd1de6odab8ccd5e5430760@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-20 4:47 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-20 18:45 ` John Rigby
2009-10-20 18:55 ` Steve Sakoman
2009-10-19 14:52 ` Dirk Behme
2009-10-19 15:29 ` Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004701ca4ea5$aeacefe0$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com' \
--to=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=jcrigby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox