RE: [PATCH 07/12] System Control Module context save/restore

["Rajendra Nayak" <rnayak@ti.com>]

> >>>  #define OMAP3430_PRM_RSTST \
> >>>  		OMAP34XX_PRM_REGADDR(OMAP3430_GR_MOD, RM_RSTST)
> >>> +static struct omap3_control_module_regs control_ctx;
> >>> +
> >> I'm not sure what this patch was generated against, but it doesn't
> >> apply against linux-omap.  The PRM_RSTST definition above is not in
> >> linux-omap code.
> >>
> >> Kevin
> > 
> > There is no reference to PRM_RSTST in this patch. It uses 
> RM_RSTST which
> > can be found in arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm.h.
> 
> You can see in the above quoted text that your 7/12 patch 
> adds some code
> immediately after a line which defines OMAP3430_PRM_RSTST.   
> Since this 
> existing code is not in linux-omap, and I couldn't find it in 
> previous 
> patches, it's not clear what this patch was generated against.
> 
> Kevin

Yes, those lines are not present in linux-omap and are added by patch [PATCH 03/06] scratchpad populate
posted by me on 08/26/2008. It is part of the patch set [PATCH 00/06] OMAP3 CPUidle patches - supports C0-C5
posted the same day.

To summarise I have posted 2 patch sets as discussed earlier for CPUIdle
1) [PATCH 00/06] OMAP3 CPUidle patches - supports C0-C5 - posted on 08/26/2008
2) [PATCH 00/12] OMAP3 CPUidle context save/restore patches -      supports C6 - posted on 09/01/2008

Apart from these the following patch set posted by Jouni is needed for these patches to apply
1) [PATCH 0/4] Refreshed PM workaround patches 2. - posted on 07/15/2008
NOTE: Patch 1/4 from this set is already pushed in l-o mainline.

So if you apply the patches in the following order on top of commit 81c893795c2e1fbe0bf5f638e.. I am 
hoping they should work.
1) [PATCH 0/4] Refreshed PM workaround patches 2.
2) [PATCH 00/06] OMAP3 CPUidle patches - supports C0-C5
3) [PATCH 00/12] OMAP3 CPUidle context save/restore patches