From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 07/14] remoteproc/omap: Add support for DRA7xx remote processors
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:34:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <065b32a7-f346-e262-2f03-9ad5e2a462c8@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ff029a9-20bd-2fec-9bcf-f97cd1bd5f85@ti.com>
On 08/01/2020 21:39, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Tero,
>
> On 1/2/20 7:18 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>
>> DRA7xx/AM57xx SoCs have two IPU and up to two DSP processor subsystems
>> for offloading different computation algorithms. The IPU processor
>> subsystem contains dual-core ARM Cortex-M4 processors, and is very
>> similar to those on OMAP5. The DSP processor subsystem is based on
>> the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac core.
>>
>> Support has been added to the OMAP remoteproc driver through new
>> DRA7xx specific compatibles for properly probing and booting all
>> the different processor subsystem instances on DRA7xx/AM57xx
>> SoCs - IPU1, IPU2, DSP1 & DSP2. A build dependency with SOC_DRA7XX
>> is added to enable the driver to be built in DRA7xx-only configuration.
>>
>> The DSP boot address programming needed enhancement for DRA7xx as the
>> boot register fields are different on DRA7 compared to OMAP4 and OMAP5
>> SoCs. The register on DRA7xx contains additional fields within the
>> register and the boot address bit-field is right-shifted by 10 bits.
>> The internal memory parsing logic has also been updated to compute
>> the device addresses for the L2 RAM for DSP devices using relative
>> addressing logic, and to parse two additional RAMs at L1 level - L1P
>> and L1D. This allows the remoteproc driver to support loading into
>> these regions for a small subset of firmware images requiring as
>> such. The most common usage would be to use the L1 programmable
>> RAMs as L1 Caches.
>>
>> The firmware lookup logic also has to be adjusted for DRA7xx as
>> there are (can be) more than one instance of both the IPU and DSP
>> remote processors for the first time in OMAP4+ SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> [t-kristo@ti.com: moved address translation quirks to pdata]
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v4:
>> - data format change due to device data changes to mem layout
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index 94afdde4bc9f..d6450d7fcf92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ config IMX_REMOTEPROC
>>
>> config OMAP_REMOTEPROC
>> tristate "OMAP remoteproc support"
>> - depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5
>> + depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX
>> depends on OMAP_IOMMU
>> select MAILBOX
>> select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> index 8a6dd742a8b1..9140c528c416 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -34,10 +34,13 @@
>> * struct omap_rproc_boot_data - boot data structure for the DSP omap rprocs
>> * @syscon: regmap handle for the system control configuration module
>> * @boot_reg: boot register offset within the @syscon regmap
>> + * @boot_reg_shift: bit-field shift required for the boot address value in
>> + * @boot_reg
>> */
>> struct omap_rproc_boot_data {
>> struct regmap *syscon;
>> unsigned int boot_reg;
>> + unsigned int boot_reg_shift;
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -159,6 +162,8 @@ static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc)
>> struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
>> struct omap_rproc_boot_data *bdata = oproc->boot_data;
>> u32 offset = bdata->boot_reg;
>> + u32 value;
>> + u32 mask;
>>
>> if (rproc->bootaddr & (SZ_1K - 1)) {
>> dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 1KB boundary\n",
>> @@ -166,7 +171,10 @@ static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr);
>> + value = rproc->bootaddr >> bdata->boot_reg_shift;
>> + mask = ~(SZ_1K - 1) >> bdata->boot_reg_shift;
>> +
>> + regmap_update_bits(bdata->syscon, offset, mask, value);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -296,6 +304,13 @@ static const struct omap_rproc_mem_data ipu_mems[] = {
>> { },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct omap_rproc_mem_data dra7_dsp_mems[] = {
>> + { .name = "l2ram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 },
>> + { .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 },
>> + { .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap4_dsp_dev_data = {
>> .device_name = "dsp",
>> };
>> @@ -314,6 +329,16 @@ static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap5_ipu_dev_data = {
>> .mems = ipu_mems,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data dra7_dsp_dev_data = {
>> + .device_name = "dsp",
>> + .mems = dra7_dsp_mems,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data dra7_ipu_dev_data = {
>> + .device_name = "ipu",
>> + .mems = ipu_mems,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct of_device_id omap_rproc_of_match[] = {
>> {
>> .compatible = "ti,omap4-dsp",
>> @@ -331,6 +356,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_rproc_of_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "ti,omap5-ipu",
>> .data = &omap5_ipu_dev_data,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "ti,dra7-dsp",
>> + .data = &dra7_dsp_dev_data,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "ti,dra7-ipu",
>> + .data = &dra7_ipu_dev_data,
>> + },
>> {
>> /* end */
>> },
>> @@ -383,6 +416,9 @@ static int omap_rproc_get_boot_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,bootreg-shift",
>> + &oproc->boot_data->boot_reg_shift);
>
> Missing error checks, guess you will have to change this anyway when you
> address Rob's comments.
This one is actually intentional. The only expected failure is missing
the ti,bootreg-shift, but even this is a valid situation; we will just
use bootreg shift value of zero (boot-data is zero initialized.)
-Tero
>
> regards
> Suman
>
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-02 13:18 [PATCHv4 00/14] remoteproc: updates for omap remoteproc support Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add OMAP remoteproc bindings Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:25 ` [RESEND PATCHv4 " Tero Kristo
2020-01-03 23:38 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-07 11:01 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-07 15:48 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-08 16:49 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-16 7:51 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-16 14:00 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:26 ` [PATCHv4 " Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 02/14] remoteproc/omap: Add device tree support Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 17:55 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-09 8:53 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 03/14] remoteproc/omap: Add a sanity check for DSP boot address alignment Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 04/14] remoteproc/omap: Add support to parse internal memories from DT Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 18:05 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-09 9:12 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-09 17:19 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 05/14] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to_va() implementation Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 06/14] remoteproc/omap: Initialize and assign reserved memory node Tero Kristo
2020-01-07 13:37 ` Andrew F. Davis
2020-01-07 14:25 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-07 14:37 ` Andrew F. Davis
2020-01-08 17:22 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 07/14] remoteproc/omap: Add support for DRA7xx remote processors Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 19:39 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-15 12:34 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 08/14] remoteproc/omap: remove the platform_data header Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 19:44 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-15 12:58 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 09/14] remoteproc/omap: Check for undefined mailbox messages Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 10/14] remoteproc/omap: Request a timer(s) for remoteproc usage Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 21:30 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 11/14] remoteproc/omap: add support for system suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 19:57 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-08 21:42 ` Suman Anna
2020-01-15 13:20 ` Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 12/14] remoteproc/omap: add support for runtime auto-suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 13/14] remoteproc/omap: report device exceptions and trigger recovery Tero Kristo
2020-01-02 13:18 ` [PATCHv4 14/14] remoteproc/omap: add watchdog functionality for remote processors Tero Kristo
2020-01-08 20:11 ` Suman Anna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=065b32a7-f346-e262-2f03-9ad5e2a462c8@ti.com \
--to=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox