From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
Subject: RE: 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:35:35 +0530
Message-ID: <0a8f7e11ed463078411f7692ea233a92@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0C40218E-D65B-4DAE-ABBB-0CB1A02A0E5E@dominion.thruhere.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.77]:53858 "EHLO
	na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754102Ab1AKLFi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 06:05:38 -0500
Received: by mail-wy0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 11so21301926wyi.24
        for <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:05:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0C40218E-D65B-4DAE-ABBB-0CB1A02A0E5E@dominion.thruhere.net>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>, l-o List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>

Koen Kooi wrote:
> Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?

Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking mainline, is
this still needed?

- Anand