From: "shekhar, chandra" <x0044955@ti.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:16:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b7d01c9485e$bca27960$LocalHost@wipultra806> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081114214635.GC31944@frodo
I had tested twl4030 at 3.4 Mbps couple of months back and it was working fine
with current settings. It wasn't a rigorous testing though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felipe Balbi" <me@felipebalbi.com>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: <me@felipebalbi.com>; <ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com>;
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:08:10PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> On Friday 14 November 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:45:30AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> > > And should it let at least some boards talk to their
>> > > TWL chips at 3.4 MBit/sec (top speed for standard
>> > > highspeed I2C) instead of 2.6 Mbit/sec (pokey slow)?
>> > > I've always wondered why all the boards configured
>> > > those links to be seemingly slower than allowed ...
>> >
>> > I think it came from board-3430sdp.c
>>
>> So you're saying there was *never* a need for that slowdown,
>> and everyone was just copying an existing buglet?
>>
>> I know I didn't make time to test whether faster speeds
>> would work ... but had expected there was a reason, at
>> some point, for that detuning.
>
> There was a need. But I think it should be fixed by now. I shall test
> tw5030 with 3.4Mbit/sec on monday. Will report.
>
> --
> balbi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-17 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-14 8:41 [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-14 19:45 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 20:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-11-14 20:08 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 21:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-11-17 2:46 ` shekhar, chandra [this message]
2008-11-18 5:36 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 20:38 ` Steve Sakoman
2008-11-19 12:07 ` Eero Nurkkala
2008-11-21 22:08 ` Tony Lindgren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-13 6:06 Eero Nurkkala
2009-01-23 2:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-11-26 13:44 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-27 8:38 ` Eero Nurkkala
2009-01-08 13:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-01-09 20:27 ` Kainan Cha
2009-01-12 6:29 ` Eero Nurkkala
2008-11-25 6:56 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-11 6:52 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-11 13:21 ` shekhar, chandra
2008-11-10 10:46 ext-eero.nurkkala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0b7d01c9485e$bca27960$LocalHost@wipultra806' \
--to=x0044955@ti.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox