From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Richard Earnshaw" <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,
"Richard Sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
"Ramana Radhakrishnan" <ramanara@nvidia.com>,
"Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>,
"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Janusz Krzysztofik" <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nikita Shubin" <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Jeremy J. Peper" <jeremy@jeremypeper.com>,
debian-arm@lists.debian.org,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:53:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ca5b09d-13f6-4ea8-8a25-a189f1875a75@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801182313.GD47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 20:23, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 10:59:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Would the timing make any difference to you? I.e. does it help
>> to keep another year or two, or would dropping it in early 2025
>> be the same?
>
> Early 2025 could come too soon, but anyway during 2025 sounds OK. Let's
> see if anyone else has comments. At least one more LTS release where it
> has been tested would be nice.
To be clear: with "early 2025" I meant after the next LTS release
(6.12 as it seems), but one LTS later (early 2026) is still a
good outlook.
>> Ok, noted. Since you are doing the testing, that at least means
>> we have a chance of cleaning up the code gradually towards using
>> DT. Dmitry has started a migration of platform_data towards
>> DT compatible device properties, which can be done gradually
>> for the 22 platform drivers you use. This unfortunately still
>> leaves the nonstandard dmaengine interface (for UDC), but we
>> can deal with that later.
>
> I have some plans to work on that. There's a long-standing bug with 15xx
> DMA, but I have gotten that working, just need send those fixes out. After
> that the conversion to new dmaengine should be more straightforward,
> as we have a working testable reference for both boards using the UDC.
Nice, that does give a realistic hope of eventually doing a full
DT conversion then. If we manage to do both the DMA engine and
the device properties work, I would hope that writing an equivalent
dts file gets fairly easy.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 17:29 [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-31 19:13 ` Aaro Koskinen
2024-08-01 8:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 18:23 ` Aaro Koskinen
2024-08-02 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-08-05 7:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-05 12:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2024-08-05 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 8:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-01 14:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-08-02 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-02 23:04 ` Linus Walleij
2024-08-20 14:58 ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-08-20 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 19:53 ` Linus Walleij
2024-08-02 14:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-15 18:24 ` Matt Turner
2024-08-19 7:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-15 19:53 ` jeremy
2024-08-19 9:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 14:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-19 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 17:08 ` jeremy
2024-08-21 6:15 ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 7:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ca5b09d-13f6-4ea8-8a25-a189f1875a75@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=debian-arm@lists.debian.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jeremy@jeremypeper.com \
--cc=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
--cc=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
--cc=ramanara@nvidia.com \
--cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox