Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Richard Earnshaw" <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,
	"Richard Sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	"Ramana Radhakrishnan" <ramanara@nvidia.com>,
	"Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>,
	"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	"Janusz Krzysztofik" <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
	"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
	Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nikita Shubin" <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"Jeremy J. Peper" <jeremy@jeremypeper.com>,
	debian-arm@lists.debian.org,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:53:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ca5b09d-13f6-4ea8-8a25-a189f1875a75@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801182313.GD47080@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 20:23, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 10:59:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> 
>> Would the timing make any difference to you? I.e. does it help
>> to keep another year or two, or would dropping it in early 2025
>> be the same?
>
> Early 2025 could come too soon, but anyway during 2025 sounds OK. Let's
> see if anyone else has comments. At least one more LTS release where it
> has been tested would be nice.

To be clear: with "early 2025" I meant after the next LTS release
(6.12 as it seems), but one LTS later (early 2026) is still a
good outlook.

>> Ok, noted. Since you are doing the testing, that at least means
>> we have a chance of cleaning up the code gradually towards using
>> DT. Dmitry has started a migration of platform_data towards
>> DT compatible device properties, which can be done gradually
>> for the 22 platform drivers you use. This unfortunately still
>> leaves the nonstandard dmaengine interface (for UDC), but we
>> can deal with that later.
>
> I have some plans to work on that. There's a long-standing bug with 15xx
> DMA, but I have gotten that working, just need send those fixes out. After
> that the conversion to new dmaengine should be more straightforward,
> as we have a working testable reference for both boards using the UDC.

Nice, that does give a realistic hope of eventually doing a full
DT conversion then. If we manage to do both the DMA engine and
the device properties work, I would hope that writing an equivalent
dts file gets fairly easy.

     Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-02 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-31 17:29 [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-31 19:13 ` Aaro Koskinen
2024-08-01  8:59   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 18:23     ` Aaro Koskinen
2024-08-02 12:53       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-08-05  7:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-05 12:30       ` Tony Lindgren
2024-08-05 13:37         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01  8:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-01 14:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-08-02 15:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-02 23:04     ` Linus Walleij
2024-08-20 14:58     ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-08-20 16:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 19:53 ` Linus Walleij
2024-08-02 14:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-15 18:24 ` Matt Turner
2024-08-19  7:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-15 19:53 ` jeremy
2024-08-19  9:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 14:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 14:23       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-19 14:34         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-19 17:08         ` jeremy
2024-08-21  6:15 ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21  7:51   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ca5b09d-13f6-4ea8-8a25-a189f1875a75@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=debian-arm@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jeremy@jeremypeper.com \
    --cc=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
    --cc=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
    --cc=ramanara@nvidia.com \
    --cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox