From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
To: "Högander Jouni" <jouni.hogander@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com
Subject: Re: Bug in linux omap clock framework?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:59:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228895990.31061.13.camel@tubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87prk0cwfy.fsf@trdhcp146196.ntc.nokia.com>
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:37 +0200, Högander Jouni wrote:
> "ext Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 02:24 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> Hi Tomi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 16:51 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> > > Hi Tomi,
> >> > >
> >> > > nice test case.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Tomi.Valkeinen@nokia.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I have had strange clk_enable() crashes with DSS2, and now I managed to
> >> > > > isolate it. With the included patch, on OMAP3 SDP board, with default
> >> > > > kernel config, I always get the crash below. In this example case it
> >> > > > happens at specific time on boot, but with DSS2 it happens randomly at
> >> > > > runtime, when I enable the DSS clocks.
> >> > >
> >>
> >> At this point my guess would be that it is a DSS driver problem, but I
> >> don't think it is clear yet.
> >>
> >
> > I don't know much about power and clock domains, but I believe I found
> > the reason and fix for this. At least this should point to the right
> > direction.
> >
> > It looks to me that when I do clk_enable() to a clock which is inside a
> > turned off powerdomain, clk_enable() function will return before the
> > powerdomain is fully turned on. Reading PM_PWSTST_DSS shows that the
> > powerdomain is still in transition state.
> >
> > The following change waits until the powerdomain has finished the
> > transition. At least it fixed the problem for me, and other things seem
> > to be still working =).
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > index fa62f14..f713d0b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ int omap2_clkdm_clk_enable(struct clockdomain *clkdm, struct clk *clk)
> > else
> > omap2_clkdm_wakeup(clkdm);
> >
> > + pwrdm_wait_transition(clkdm->pwrdm.ptr);
> > +
>
> Altough this patch is fixing the problem, I'll guess it's because of
> delay it causes rather than waiting for
> PM_PWSTST_DSS. omap2_clkdm_clk_enable alone doesn't switch pwrdm to
> on. This is because clockdomain/powerdomains are controlled by HW (hw
> supervised).
>
> I think the right answer is to use ST_*_IDLE & ST_*_STDBY bits in
> omap2_clk_wait_ready.
But ST_DSS_IDLE says active only after both interface and functional
clock are on, so it doesn't help here.
Why is it wrong to wait for PM_PWSTST_DSS? Do you mean that this crash
is not caused by the DSS being not powered on, but by something else,
and so the small delay just accidentally fixes the problem?
Tomi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 14:49 Bug in linux omap clock framework? Tomi.Valkeinen
2008-12-05 18:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2008-12-08 7:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-06 23:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-08 8:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-08 9:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-08 9:36 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 13:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 23:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-10 3:04 ` Igor Stoppa
2008-12-10 7:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-10 7:37 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 7:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2008-12-10 8:44 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 8:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-10 10:44 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 11:53 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-11 9:19 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-11 16:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-12 7:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 9:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228895990.31061.13.camel@tubuntu \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com \
--cc=jouni.hogander@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox