From: Peter Barada <peterb@logicpd.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PM branch rebased to 2.6.29
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:37:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237927075.23022.136.camel@blackhole> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C940CA.9070805@deeprootsystems.com>
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 13:21 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Peter Barada wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:08 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Peter Barada <peterb@logicpd.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 22:21 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >>>> FYI...
> >>>>
> >>>> The PM branch has now been rebased to today's linux-omap HEAD which is
> >>>> based on v2.6.29-rc8. The previous PM branch has been renamed to
> >>>> pm-2.6.28. Depending on when you look, Tony's linux-omap tree may not
> >>>> (yet) have the latest PM branch. If not, you can use my PM tree[1]
> >>>> directly. Also, pm-2.6.28 will only be available on my tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tested on OMAP3 Beagle and RX51 and was able to hit RET and OFF in
> >>>> suspend and in PM idle with minimal kernel. No testing yet done for
> >>>> CPUidle or DVFS. Please test on your hardware and submit results to
> >>>> the list. Thanks.
> >>> Kevin, did you build/test with
> >>> the /arc/arm/config/omap3_beagle_defconfig, and
> >>> arc/arm/configs/rx51_defconfig or some other config(could you send it to
> >>> me if it isn't in the PM tree)?
> >> I started with the ones in the tree, but I disable most of the drivers
> >> and turn on some debugging features. Attached is the one I used for
> >> beagle.
> >> [...]
> >
> > Hmm, I modified your config to add smc911x support so I can have an
> > nfsroot, added selector/code for my board(based on omap3beagle.c) and
> > brought it up on my hardware, but I'm not sure if its working correctly.
> > It does look to pause in the suspend sate, and comes out when I hit a
> > key on the console, but the messages don't look quite right as
> > core_pwrdm and per_pwrdm state they didn't go into state 1 (full log
> > attached):
> >
> > omap3530# echo mem > /sys/power/state
> > PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
> > Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> > Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> > PM: Entering mem sleep
> > Powerdomain (core_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
> > Powerdomain (per_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
> > Could not enter target state in pm_suspend
> > eth0: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore
> >
> > eth0: link down
> > PM: Finishing wakeup.
> > Restarting tasks ... done.
> > omap3530#
> > omap3530# eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
> >
> >
> > Is this expected?
> >
>
> Yes, you haven't allowed the UART clocks to go off during idle/suspend
> and there are UARTs in both CORE and PER.
>
> Try this before going into suspend:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/power/clocks_off_while_idle
>
> This will allow UART clocks to be disabled on suspend, and also allow
> them to be disabled after 5 seconds of UART inactivity allowing
> retention in idle as well.
that Fixed PER, but CORE still says it couldn't go into state 1:
omap3530# echo 1 > /sys/power/clocks_off_while_idle
omap3530# echo mem > /sys/power/state
PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
PM: Entering mem sleep
Powerdomain (core_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
Could not enter target state in pm_suspend
eth0: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore
eth0: link down
PM: Finishing wakeup.
Restarting tasks ... done.
omap3530# eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
>
> Kevin
--
Peter Barada <peterb@logicpd.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 5:21 PM branch rebased to 2.6.29 Kevin Hilman
2009-03-18 7:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-03-18 15:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-19 22:20 ` David Brownell
2009-03-20 18:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-03-20 19:46 ` David Brownell
2009-03-20 19:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-03-20 21:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-03-20 22:36 ` David Brownell
2009-03-24 17:10 ` Peter Barada
2009-03-24 18:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-24 20:11 ` Peter Barada
2009-03-24 20:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-24 20:37 ` Peter Barada [this message]
2009-03-27 20:50 ` Russ Dill
2009-03-30 10:08 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-03-30 10:42 ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-30 13:22 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-03-30 17:44 ` Russ Dill
2009-03-30 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-30 18:18 ` Peter Barada
2009-03-30 18:43 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-30 23:01 ` Russ Dill
2009-03-31 7:01 ` Russ Dill
2009-03-31 18:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-31 21:31 ` Russ Dill
2009-03-31 23:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-04-01 1:30 ` Russ Dill
2009-04-01 4:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-03-26 16:54 ` Jean Pihet
2009-03-26 17:01 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1237927075.23022.136.camel@blackhole \
--to=peterb@logicpd.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox