From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] omapfb: Condition mutex acquisition Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:32:01 +0300 Message-ID: <1254299521.23991.53.camel@tubuntu> References: ,<1254234160.23991.1.camel@tubuntu> ,<1254236004.23991.17.camel@tubuntu> <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940436C4483D@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:50998 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752764AbZI3IcH (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:32:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E73940436C4483D@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "ext Hiremath, Vaibhav" Cc: "Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto" , "Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 20:26 +0200, ext Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > Tomi, > > Don't you think we should also make use of mm_lock in new OMAP2 Fbdev driver, to be more specific and safer side? > Hmm yes, I think we should. One more thing to the TODO list =) Tomi