From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:43:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1265629385.2433.29.camel@tubuntu.research.nokia.com> References: <20100208172521.abb500b4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1265621346.2433.27.camel@tubuntu.research.nokia.com> <20100208215715.c78b2a9c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100208215715.c78b2a9c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: ext Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tony Lindgren , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vaibhav Hiremath , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:57 +0100, ext Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:29:06 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > P.S. Tomi, this omap_dss2 commit only has your Acked-by not Signed-off-by. > > > > Hmm, do you mean there's something wrong with that, or "jfyi"? Aren't I, > > as a subsys maintainer, supposed to ack the patches? > > If a patch goes through your tree, you are supposed to add a Signed-off-by > line. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches section called "Sign your > work". So it is. Thanks for pointing this out, I'll change the acks to signed-offs. Tomi