From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:07:08 +0300 Message-ID: <1274080028.2307.3.camel@tubuntu.research.nokia.com> References: <20100507134334.75808884.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100510202056.GG16460@atomide.com> <1273654744.2814.14.camel@tubuntu.research.nokia.com> <20100514190906.GA3428@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:30912 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314Ab0EQHH3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 03:07:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100514190906.GA3428@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Tony Lindgren Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Quadros Roger (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , Jarkko Nikula , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 21:09 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [100512 01:54]: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:20 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Stephen Rothwell [100506 22:05]: > > > > Hi Tomi, > > > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the omap_dss2 tree got a conflict in > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c between commit > > > > e87da74e34ad151e6ae75ebb7a7bf447f02c0004 ("omap: rx51: Add supplies for > > > > the tlv320aic3x codec driver") from the omap tree and commit > > > > a693839eab0292aa234d7a6f48d40389389baebb ("OMAP: RX51: Add "vdds_sdi" > > > > supply voltage for SDI") from the omap_dss2 tree. > > > > > > > > Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the > > > > fix as necessary. > > > > > > Thanks again Stephen. We will move the conflicting DSS board-*.c > > > file changes over to omap for next. > > > > > > Tomi, do you want to do a branch of board-*.c patches for me to > > > pull, or do you want me to just pick this one? > > > > I think it's ok to pick just this one. It's just adds a regulator > > supply, and doesn't interfere with anything. I just need to make sure > > linux-omap's for-next is merged first, before I send my pull request. > > Thanks, I've picked this patch. > > > I made a branch for it, based on linux-omap/for-next: > > git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git for-tony > > > > And I dropped the patch from my for-next branch. > > Tomi, next time please check that your branch is based on > either the most recent tag by Linus, or in the conflicting > cases you can base on omap-for-linus branch. Please don't > base on for-next or other branches that are not yet > static, we don't want the merge history of duplicate branches. Oh, that branch was just for you to cherry pick the one patch. My "normal" branches are based on official tags. Tomi