From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:08:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1274868484.5882.5176.camel@twins> References: <1274482015-30899-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <201005242049.18920.rjw@sisk.pl> <87wrusvrqe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <201005250138.16293.rjw@sisk.pl> <1274863655.5882.4875.camel@twins> <1274867106.5882.5090.camel@twins> <20100526120242.5c9b73ad@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100526120242.5c9b73ad@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Mickler Cc: Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux PM , LKML , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Tony Lindgren , Paul Walmsley List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:02 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > The summary is: The device this kernel is running on dosn't want to > (or can) rely on userspace to save power. This is because it is an open > system, without an app-store or the like. Everyone can run what he > wants. > > So anything relying on (all) userspace solves a different problem. So what stops an application from grabbing a suspend blocker?