From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:15:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1274886947.1674.1757.camel@laptop> References: <1274482015-30899-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <201005242049.18920.rjw@sisk.pl> <87wrusvrqe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <201005250138.16293.rjw@sisk.pl> <1274863655.5882.4875.camel@twins> <1274867106.5882.5090.camel@twins> <20100526120242.5c9b73ad@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100526133721.602633b2@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100526142430.327ccbc4@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100526141612.3e2e0443@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100526171106.0e44a736@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:49612 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755370Ab0EZPPu (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 11:15:50 -0400 Received: from f199130.upc-f.chello.nl ([80.56.199.130] helo=dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OHIKj-0006aC-TH for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 15:15:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20100526171106.0e44a736@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Mickler Cc: Alan Cox , Vitaly Wool , LKML , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote: > I'm not saying that your argument is not valid. But why don't you look > at suspend blockers as a contract between userspace and kernelspace? An > Opt-In to the current guarantees the kernel provides in the non-suspend > case. That's backwards.