From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:32:13 +0200
Message-ID: <1274981533.27810.5624.camel@twins>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271327560.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271327560.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= <arve@android.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>, Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:29 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> They may be different conceptually.  Nevertheless, Android uses forced 
> suspend as a form of power saving.  Until better mechanisms are in 
> place, it makes sense. 

So let them, doesn't mean we have to merge it. Or will you saw your foot
off too if google were to promotes it?