From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:52:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1274982779.27810.5708.camel@twins> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:42235 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759331Ab0E0RxM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:53:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Matthew Garrett , Thomas Gleixner , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:44 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > You close your laptop's lid and throw the machine into a backpack. At > that time you want it to suspend even though it may not be idle. > > > We've been trying to tell you you don't need that. > > And I'm trying to tell you that you do. Shall we henceforth stop confusing forced suspend for laptops and powersaving a running system?