From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Petrovitsch Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1275040988.20005.29.camel@thorin> References: <20100527210808.GB8865@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527212852.GA9859@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100527212852.GA9859@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Alan Stern , Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Don, 2010-05-27 at 22:28 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:24:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Would it help to divide the application into two processes, one of > > which receives events and the other does the drawing? > > At the point where you're rewriting the application you can just make it > adhere to our current behavioural standards anyway. Thank you for confirming that the so-called "feature" is just there to make apps work in some area that are crappy anyways - and God knows in which other areas they are crappy too. SCNR, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at