From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 20:12:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1275156736.1645.498.camel@laptop> References: <20100527222514.0a1710bf@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527230806.4deb6de3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527220949.GB10602@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527232357.6d14fdb2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527223605.GB11364@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527235546.09f3ce8a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528043114.GC26177@thunk.org> <1275030704.32462.11.camel@laptop> <1275120618.27810.12699.camel@twins> <1275149418.4503.128.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40653 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755472Ab0EaQeC (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2010 12:34:02 -0400 Received: from f199130.upc-f.chello.nl ([80.56.199.130] helo=dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OJ7wA-0005Zf-4h for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 16:34:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1275149418.4503.128.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , tytso@mit.edu, LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Alan Cox On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 11:10 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > Not using suspend is exactly the point. As Alan has argued, propagating > > suspend blockers up into all regions of userspace will take much longer > > than fixing the hardware. > > Strange, that's not what I heard as the possible solution. <20100527232043.784d5c72@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528101755.7b5f6b8a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>