From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: suspend blockers & Android integration Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1275731653.27810.41078.camel@twins> References: <20100603193045.GA7188@elte.hu> <20100603231153.GA11302@elte.hu> <20100603232302.GA16184@elte.hu> <20100604071354.GA14451@elte.hu> <20100604083423.GD15181@elte.hu> <1275653210.27810.39762.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= Cc: Ingo Molnar , tytso@mit.edu, Brian Swetland , Neil Brown , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern , Felipe Balbi , LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds , Kevin Hilman , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arjan van de Ven List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:10 -0700, Arve Hj=C3=B8nnev=C3=A5g wrote: > > Trusted processes are assumed to be sane and idle when there is not= hing > > for them to do, allowing the machine to go into deep idle states. > > >=20 > Neither the kernel nor our trusted user-space code currently meets > this criteria.=20 Then both need fixing. Really, that's the only sane approach.