From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: khilman@deeprootsystems.com, b-cousson@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: [RFC: PATCH] Fix to support multiple HWMODS for a single device
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:16:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282560403-30375-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> (raw)
The current HWMOD code expects multiple HWMODS to be filled in consecutive
memory location before passing to omap_device_build_ss(). Ignoring this
will result in incorrect HWMOD data being extracted. This means before calling
omap_device_build_ss() the user has to create memory chunks, copy all the HWMOD
structures to it taking care of the mutex.
This fix uses the pointer to pointer to OMAP_HWMOD structure passed to
omap_device_build_ss() to correctly extract the appropriate
OMAP_HWMOD structure.
This patch is created on top of origin/pm-wip/hwmods-omap4.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
index d2b1609..e94bd7a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@ static inline struct omap_device *_find_by_pdev(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
int omap_device_count_resources(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int c = 0;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- c += omap_hwmod_count_resources(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ c += omap_hwmod_count_resources(*oh);
pr_debug("omap_device: %s: counted %d total resources across %d "
"hwmods\n", od->pdev.name, c, od->hwmods_cnt);
@@ -289,12 +289,12 @@ int omap_device_count_resources(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, struct resource *res)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int c = 0;
int i, r;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++) {
- r = omap_hwmod_fill_resources(oh, res);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++) {
+ r = omap_hwmod_fill_resources(*oh, res);
res += r;
c += r;
}
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int ret, i;
struct omap_device *od;
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
od = _find_by_pdev(pdev);
@@ -579,8 +579,8 @@ int omap_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = _omap_device_deactivate(od, IGNORE_WAKEUP_LAT);
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_shutdown(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_shutdown(*oh);
od->_state = OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_SHUTDOWN;
@@ -692,11 +692,11 @@ void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_enable_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_enable(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_enable(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ int omap_device_enable_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_idle_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_idle(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_idle(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -729,11 +729,11 @@ int omap_device_idle_hwmods(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_disable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_disable_clocks(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_disable_clocks(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
@@ -748,11 +748,11 @@ int omap_device_disable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
*/
int omap_device_enable_clocks(struct omap_device *od)
{
- struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+ struct omap_hwmod **oh;
int i;
- for (i = 0, oh = *od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
- omap_hwmod_enable_clocks(oh);
+ for (i = 0, oh = od->hwmods; i < od->hwmods_cnt; i++, oh++)
+ omap_hwmod_enable_clocks(*oh);
/* XXX pass along return value here? */
return 0;
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-23 10:46 Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2010-08-23 11:49 ` [RFC: PATCH] Fix to support multiple HWMODS for a single device Cousson, Benoit
2010-08-23 12:01 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
2010-08-23 16:20 ` kishon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282560403-30375-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox