From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, vishwanath.bs@ti.com,
sawant@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP4: pm.c extensions for OMAP4 support
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:35:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284489354.2661.74.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284488501.2661.72.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 11:21 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:44 +0530, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> > OMAP4 has an iva device and a dsp devcice where as OMAP2/3
> > has only an iva device. In this file the iva device in the
> > system is registered under the name dsp_dev and the API
> > to retrieve the iva device is omap2_get_dsp_device.
> > This patch renames the dsp_dev to iva_dev, renames
> > omap2_get_dsp_device to omap2_get_iva_device,
> > registers dsp_dev for OMAP4 and adds a new API
> > omap4_get_dsp_device to retrieve the dep_dev.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Removed fixing of l3_main hwmod for OMAP4 as Benoit has
> > already submitted a pach fixing the same.
> > v3: Put OMAP4 check across dsp_dev init so that on other
> > OMAP's this init does not throw a warn.
>
> Thanks, queuing for 2.6.37 in my pm-next branch.
>
> I changed the subject slightly, and I had to fix up a conflict that
> wasn't there when you submitted, so I fixed it myself: basically, there
> was already a cpu_is_omap4* check in the function due to the l3_main
> name differences, so I just added the dsp check to the existing cpu_is
> check.
Ignore the bit about the conflict. It applies cleanly to my pm-next.
The conflict is when merging with the l3_main name change later in the
pm-core branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-14 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 8:14 [PATCH v3] OMAP4: pm.c extensions for OMAP4 support Thara Gopinath
2010-09-14 18:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-14 18:35 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284489354.2661.74.camel@localhost \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=sawant@ti.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox