From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add OMAP hardware spinlock misc driver Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:48:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1287416880.1998.1927.camel@laptop> References: <1287387875-14168-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1287406015.29097.1579.camel@twins> <20101018133502.GA12449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1287409417.29097.1598.camel@twins> <1287415929.29097.1616.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:37175 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755327Ab0JRPsK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:48:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Catalin Marinas , Russell King - ARM Linux , Hari Kanigeri , Suman Anna , Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:35 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Sure, but you can 'easily' extend your coherency protocols with support > > In our case, there are no coherency protocols supported between the > A9, M3 and the DSP. Sure, I got that, I was simply commenting on Catalin's statement that cache coherency doesn't (need to) bring atomic modifications.