From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [v2] omap:mailbox-enhancements and fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:17:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1289416656.16560.15.camel@eowin>
References: <1289393121-7911-1-git-send-email-h-kanigeri2@ti.com>
	 <4CDACB0E.3050403@ti.com>
	 <AANLkTi=jL-aV0Xn3rcnZwaYLz9nY5QwXbGPHsdq1R2Gz@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4CDAEB5C.6000703@ti.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:40090 "EHLO
	serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756558Ab0KJTRn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:17:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4CDAEB5C.6000703@ti.com>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Hari Kanigeri <hari.kanigeri@gmail.com>, "Kanigeri, Hari" <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>, Hiroshi Doyu <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>, linux omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>

Hi,

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:58 +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> My point was that checkpatch is supposed to check patch... but it's true 
> that is can check the code as well. I was assuming that all the code in 
> mainline is supposed to be already checkpatch proof :-)
> It seems that this is not the case.
> 
> It might be interesting to run it on every plat-omap / mach-omap files...

you might be surprised with the results :-)

-- 
balbi