Re: [PATCH] OMAP: DSS2: Have separate irq handlers for DISPC and DSI

[Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>]

On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 05:05 -0600, Taneja, Archit wrote:
> Hi,
> 

<snip>

> One strange thing I see though is the increment with and without printks 
> in the irq handler in  both the cases. I always see increments of 2 when 
> I put prints. I see 3 when I don't. That's a bit peculiar.

Hmm. That's probably because prints make it slower. TE_TRIGGER and
VC0_IRQ probably happen at different times. If you have printks, they
are combined into one interrupt. If no printk, the code is faster and
handles them separately.

> Behavior looks as expected. I guess we can go without DSS_IRQSTATUS 
> then. Should I send out a patch? Also, should we remove DSS_IRQSTATUS in 
> totality from the code now?

Ok. Yes, please send a patch. Is DSS_IRQSTATUS used anywhere after the
patch? I guess not. But let's leave the define there, as the register
still exists.

 Tomi