From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/18] OMAP2,3 DSS2 Change driver name to omap_display Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:29:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1298881755.2278.4.camel@deskari> References: <1295850125-21405-1-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@ti.com> <1295850125-21405-6-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@ti.com> <1298539643.16119.54.camel@deskari> <1298876015.2096.36.camel@deskari> <4D6B4A1A.9000304@ti.com> <1298877549.2096.47.camel@deskari> <4D6B4E45.7080108@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:50452 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752268Ab1B1I3X (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:29:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Semwal, Sumit" Cc: "Taneja, Archit" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "Hilman, Kevin" , "Hiremath, Vaibhav" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "Guruswamy, Senthilvadivu" , "Cousson, Benoit" On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 02:16 -0600, Semwal, Sumit wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:57 PM, archit taneja wrote: > > Yes, it might get misleading if someone looking at the code tries to find > > "core" in the TRM, I guess we should stick to "omapdss_dss", this also > > ensures a uniform matching of the platform driver names and the beginning of > > register names for each HW module. > > Hmmm... I guess omapdss_dss seems a better name in this view; I'm ok > with this way of naming - do you want me to send a patch for it, or > would you update this patch itself? I've made the change. I changed the commits in my tree according to this new naming. Quite a bit of changes, so I removed tested-bys from the patches. I'll do some more testing, and push the changes to my master branch. Tomi