From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCsch?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] cbus-retu-wdt: Remove unused nonstandard interfaces Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:18:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1299161893.31972.0.camel@maggie> References: <1299082318.13604.14.camel@marge> <20110303094251.GG2644@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> (sfid-20110303_104301_717489_FFFFFFFFDB9EB0D8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 80-190-117-144.ip-home.de ([80.190.117.144]:47322 "EHLO bu3sch.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751874Ab1CCOSU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:18:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110303094251.GG2644@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> (sfid-20110303_104301_717489_FFFFFFFFDB9EB0D8) Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-omap On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:42 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:11:58PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > @@ -175,9 +124,9 @@ static int retu_wdt_release(struct inode > > struct retu_wdt_dev *wdev = file->private_data; > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT > > - retu_wdt_ping_enable(retu_wdt); > > + retu_wdt_ping_enable(wdev); > > #endif > > - clear_bit(0, &retu_wdt->users); > > + clear_bit(0, &wdev->users); > > this hunk isn't part of this patch. Well, it's a compiler warning cleanup, so I thought it would be fine to go with the big cleanup patch. Is it necessary to do a separate patch for this? -- Greetings Michael.