From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] OMAP DSS updates for 2.6.40 Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:37:03 +0300 Message-ID: <1306229823.2194.14.camel@deskari> References: <1306151004.1871.36.camel@deskari> <20110524063803.GC11986@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.240]:36045 "EHLO na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755333Ab1EXJhJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 05:37:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110524063803.GC11986@linux-sh.org> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Mundt Cc: lo-ml , lfbdev-ml On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:38 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 02:43:24PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > Here are the OMAP Display Subsystem updates for 2.6.40. > > > > Most of the patches are OMAP4 related, either fixing the old code to > > allow us to implement new OMAP4 features, or implementing those new > > features. Other bigger changes are ULPS power management feature and > > moving the DSS header file from arch/arm/plat-omap/include to > > include/video. > > > Pulled and pushed out, thanks. There were a couple of conflicts, so you > may want to doublecheck to make sure nothing was inadvertently broken. I wonder where those conflicts came from... I think this pull request never made into the 39 rcs: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg48334.html I should have checked it, but it seems I've missed those. So you had those patches in fbdev tree, and I had the same patches in my development tree (which ended up being rebased a bit), and this led to those conflicts. But diff between omapdss in my master branch and fbdev master is null, so the conflicts were resolved correctly. Tomi