From: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
markgross@thegnar.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-omap@vger.ke
Cc: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:06:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313075212-8366-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313075212-8366-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize
the data strctures:
- add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints
related data
- update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object
data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints
- update the internal code to use the new data structs.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
---
include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++
kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
index 6b0968f..9772311 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
@@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request {
int pm_qos_class;
};
+enum pm_qos_type {
+ PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED,
+ PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */
+ PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
+ * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
+ * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
+ */
+struct pm_qos_constraints {
+ struct plist_head list;
+ s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
+ s32 default_value;
+ enum pm_qos_type type;
+ struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, int pm_qos_class,
s32 value);
diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index fa9a090..66e8d6f 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -49,62 +49,54 @@
* or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock
* held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all
*/
-enum pm_qos_type {
- PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */
- PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */
-};
-
-/*
- * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
- * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
- * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
- */
struct pm_qos_object {
- struct plist_head constraints;
- struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
+ struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints;
struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev;
char *name;
- s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
- s32 default_value;
- enum pm_qos_type type;
};
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock);
static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos;
+
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier);
-static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
- .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.constraints, pm_qos_lock),
- .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
- .name = "cpu_dma_latency",
+static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = {
+ .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
.target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
.default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
.type = PM_QOS_MIN,
+ .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
+};
+static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
+ .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints,
+ .name = "cpu_dma_latency",
};
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier);
-static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
- .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.constraints,
- pm_qos_lock),
- .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
- .name = "network_latency",
+static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = {
+ .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
.target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
.default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
- .type = PM_QOS_MIN
+ .type = PM_QOS_MIN,
+ .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
+};
+static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
+ .constraints = &network_lat_constraints,
+ .name = "network_latency",
};
-
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier);
-static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
- .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.constraints,
- pm_qos_lock),
- .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
- .name = "network_throughput",
+static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = {
+ .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
.target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
.default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
.type = PM_QOS_MAX,
+ .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
+};
+static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
+ .constraints = &network_tput_constraints,
+ .name = "network_throughput",
};
-
static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = {
&null_pm_qos,
@@ -131,15 +123,15 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = {
/* unlocked internal variant */
static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
{
- if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints))
- return o->default_value;
+ if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints->list))
+ return o->constraints->default_value;
- switch (o->type) {
+ switch (o->constraints->type) {
case PM_QOS_MIN:
- return plist_first(&o->constraints)->prio;
+ return plist_first(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
case PM_QOS_MAX:
- return plist_last(&o->constraints)->prio;
+ return plist_last(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
default:
/* runtime check for not using enum */
@@ -149,12 +141,12 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
{
- return o->target_value;
+ return o->constraints->target_value;
}
static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value)
{
- o->target_value = value;
+ o->constraints->target_value = value;
}
static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
@@ -172,20 +164,20 @@ static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
* with new value and add, then see if the extremal
* changed
*/
- plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
+ plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
plist_node_init(node, value);
- plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
+ plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
} else if (del) {
- plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
+ plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
} else {
- plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
+ plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
}
curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o);
pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
if (prev_value != curr_value)
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers,
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->constraints->notifiers,
(unsigned long)curr_value,
NULL);
}
@@ -232,7 +224,7 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
return;
}
if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
- new_value = o->default_value;
+ new_value = o->constraints->default_value;
else
new_value = value;
plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value);
@@ -268,7 +260,7 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
o = pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class];
if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
- temp = o->default_value;
+ temp = o->constraints->default_value;
else
temp = new_value;
@@ -317,7 +309,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
int retval;
retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
- pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
+ pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
+ notifier);
return retval;
}
@@ -336,7 +329,8 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
int retval;
retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
- pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
+ pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
+ notifier);
return retval;
}
--
1.7.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 15:06 [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] PM QoS: move and rename the implementation files jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:47 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] PM QoS: minor clean-ups jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:48 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] PM QoS: code re-organization jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:50 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` jean.pihet [this message]
2011-08-13 2:56 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs mark gross
2011-08-13 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:29 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] PM QoS: generalize and export the constraints management code jean.pihet
2011-08-13 3:09 ` mark gross
2011-08-13 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:25 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 4:08 ` mark gross
2011-08-16 6:44 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 17:45 ` mark gross
2011-08-16 18:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] PM QoS: implement the per-device PM QoS constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-13 3:16 ` mark gross
2011-08-13 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:50 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] PM QoS: add a global notification mechanism for the device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-14 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 9:58 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP: convert I2C driver to PM QoS for latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state jean.pihet
2011-08-12 8:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 11:56 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-12 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:51 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 13:43 [PATCH v5 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints framework jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313075212-8366-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com \
--to=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.ke \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox