From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:21:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1327994480.4102.44.camel@sokoban> References: <20120130093931.11027.31048.stgit@dusk> <871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:51505 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027Ab2AaHV0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:21:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rajendra Nayak , Santosh Shilimkar On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:27 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Paul Walmsley writes: > > > This series optimizes some of the powerdomain-related code in > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm*, and fixes a bug or two. These were noticed while > > working on the functional powerstate code. > > > > Rajendra and Santosh, if you have a spare moment, could you please > > peek at the OMAP4 LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE part of the second patch? It > > makes sense to me in theory, but you both would probably know better > > than I :-) > > > > Kevin, want to take this series (assuming folks are happy with it) ? > > Yes, I'll take this and add the Ack from Santosh. Thanks for the nice > cleanup. > > Will submit after seeing a Tested-by from someone who can test with CORE > retention/off on OMAP4 (hint, hint, Tero :) Yeah, I can test these out hopefully tomorrow / today, I am busy today creating a release but lets see. :) The patches seem okay to me also at least. -Tero