From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] HSI framework Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:17:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1331119024.29171.1.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1326461140.32183.40.camel@groo> <1326975259.28477.57.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120307104923.GB18093@earth.universe> Reply-To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120307104923.GB18093@earth.universe> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Reichel , Linus Torvalds Cc: CarlosChinea , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , ext Linus Walleij , "peter_henn@gmx.de" , "sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com" , "govindraj.ti@gmail.com" , "pawel.szyszuk@stericsson.com" , Andras Domokos , ext Shubhrajyoti , ext Shubhrajyoti Datta , ext Alan Cox List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 11:49 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > I've noticed that you have not pulled this (yet). I would like to > > confirm that we at Intel are also very interested to have HSI upstream. > > > > I believe this code base is more than worth merging since it has many > > users and it has proven itself in real Nokia products. Would you please > > pull it? > > Hi, > > I think we never got a reply why the HSI framework has not been > pulled into 3.3. So what needs to be done to get it pulled into 3.4? Hi, Because this question is for Linus, he should be in "To:" instead of "Cc:" - correcting. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy