From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: code consolidation for 3.4 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:15:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1331273702.18015.92.camel@cumari> References: <20120202093600.12509.35052.stgit@dusk> <87ty39cc7s.fsf@ti.com> <87sjhjaqyi.fsf@ti.com> <1331232433.18015.69.camel@cumari> <1331233547.18015.74.camel@cumari> <87d38mbxfu.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.207]:46949 "EHLO na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414Ab2CIGPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:15:21 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k6so267544lbo.12 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:15:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d38mbxfu.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rnayak@ti.com, ido@wizery.com Hi Kevin, On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 13:21 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Luciano Coelho writes: > > [...] > > > Thanks, Paul! I was just chatting with Kevin about this on IRC. With > > your patch and no_console_suspend, it works. :) > > Just FYI... I've queued this patch from Paul and it's now queued by Tony > for v3.4 in his cleanup-pm branch. Great, thanks for the info! BTW, you and Paul said that it was not recommended to use no_console_suspend, but Ido (on CC) said that it can be useful for us, because we need to see if our own (wireless) stuff goes into suspend correctly. Are there any real problems with no_console_suspend besides power consumption? Is it safe for us to simply apply Paul's patch when we need it? -- Cheers, Luca.