From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 10:36:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338017791-9442-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338017791-9442-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
Now that every rproc instance contains a device, we don't need a
kref anymore to maintain the refcount of the rproc instances:
that's what device are good with!
This patch removes the now-redundant kref, and switches to
{get, put}_device instead of kref_{get, put}.
We also don't need the kref's release function anymore, and instead,
we just utilize the class's release handler (which is now responsible
for all memory de-allocations).
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 59 +++++++++++---------------------
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 8 ++--
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 3 --
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 9e3d4cf..7214393 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1269,42 +1269,12 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
-/**
- * rproc_release() - completely deletes the existence of a remote processor
- * @kref: the rproc's kref
- *
- * This function should _never_ be called directly.
- *
- * The only reasonable location to use it is as an argument when kref_put'ing
- * @rproc's refcount.
- *
- * This way it will be called when no one holds a valid pointer to this @rproc
- * anymore (and obviously after it is removed from the rprocs klist).
- *
- * Note: this function is not static because rproc_vdev_release() needs it when
- * it decrements @rproc's refcount.
- */
-void rproc_release(struct kref *kref)
-{
- struct rproc *rproc = container_of(kref, struct rproc, refcount);
-
- dev_info(&rproc->dev, "removing %s\n", rproc->name);
-
- rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
-
- /*
- * At this point no one holds a reference to rproc anymore,
- * so we can directly unroll rproc_alloc()
- */
- rproc_free(rproc);
-}
-
/* will be called when an rproc is added to the rprocs klist */
static void klist_rproc_get(struct klist_node *n)
{
struct rproc *rproc = container_of(n, struct rproc, node);
- kref_get(&rproc->refcount);
+ get_device(&rproc->dev);
}
/* will be called when an rproc is removed from the rprocs klist */
@@ -1312,7 +1282,7 @@ static void klist_rproc_put(struct klist_node *n)
{
struct rproc *rproc = container_of(n, struct rproc, node);
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
}
static struct rproc *next_rproc(struct klist_iter *i)
@@ -1354,7 +1324,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_name(const char *name)
klist_iter_init(&rprocs, &i);
while ((rproc = next_rproc(&i)) != NULL)
if (!strcmp(rproc->name, name)) {
- kref_get(&rproc->refcount);
+ get_device(&rproc->dev);
break;
}
klist_iter_exit(&i);
@@ -1367,7 +1337,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_name(const char *name)
ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
if (ret < 0) {
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
return NULL;
}
@@ -1394,7 +1364,7 @@ void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
rproc_shutdown(rproc);
/* downref rproc's refcount */
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_put);
@@ -1462,10 +1432,23 @@ int rproc_register(struct rproc *rproc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_register);
+/**
+ * rproc_class_release() - release a remote processor instance
+ * @dev: the rproc's device
+ *
+ * This function should _never_ be called directly.
+ *
+ * It will be called by the driver core when no one holds a valid pointer
+ * to @dev anymore.
+ */
static void rproc_class_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct rproc *rproc = container_of(dev, struct rproc, dev);
+ dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name);
+
+ rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
+
idr_remove_all(&rproc->notifyids);
idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids);
@@ -1531,8 +1514,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
atomic_set(&rproc->power, 0);
- kref_init(&rproc->refcount);
-
mutex_init(&rproc->lock);
idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
@@ -1603,8 +1584,8 @@ int rproc_unregister(struct rproc *rproc)
device_del(&rproc->dev);
- /* the rproc will only be released after its refcount drops to zero */
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ /* unroll rproc_alloc. TODO: we may want to let the users do that */
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index b662183..3541b44 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct virtio_config_ops rproc_virtio_config_ops = {
/*
* This function is called whenever vdev is released, and is responsible
- * to decrement the remote processor's refcount taken when vdev was
+ * to decrement the remote processor's refcount which was taken when vdev was
* added.
*
* Never call this function directly; it will be called by the driver
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void rproc_vdev_release(struct device *dev)
list_del(&rvdev->node);
kfree(rvdev);
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
}
/**
@@ -272,11 +272,11 @@ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
* Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement
* it _only_ when the vdev is released.
*/
- kref_get(&rproc->refcount);
+ get_device(&rproc->dev);
ret = register_virtio_device(vdev);
if (ret) {
- kref_put(&rproc->refcount, rproc_release);
+ put_device(&rproc->dev);
dev_err(dev, "failed to register vdev: %d\n", ret);
goto out;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 0b835d3..c6e46fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
#define REMOTEPROC_H
#include <linux/types.h>
-#include <linux/kref.h>
#include <linux/klist.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/virtio.h>
@@ -370,7 +369,6 @@ enum rproc_state {
* @priv: private data which belongs to the platform-specific rproc module
* @ops: platform-specific start/stop rproc handlers
* @dev: underlying device
- * @refcount: refcount of users that have a valid pointer to this rproc
* @power: refcount of users who need this rproc powered up
* @state: state of the device
* @lock: lock which protects concurrent manipulations of the rproc
@@ -393,7 +391,6 @@ struct rproc {
void *priv;
const struct rproc_ops *ops;
struct device dev;
- struct kref refcount;
atomic_t power;
unsigned int state;
struct mutex lock;
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 7:36 [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-05-26 7:36 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen [this message]
2012-05-30 8:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref Stephen Boyd
2012-05-30 12:38 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-06-04 21:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-06-05 10:25 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 8:52 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 8:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-02 9:05 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-15 10:10 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-15 9:17 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-05-30 8:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc Stephen Boyd
2012-05-30 12:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-06-04 21:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-06-29 8:13 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-02 19:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-02 19:54 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-07-05 20:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-15 9:12 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338017791-9442-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com \
--to=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=fernando.lugo@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).