From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 14/19] ARM: OMAP4: wakeupgen: enable clocks for save_secure_all Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:44:47 +0300 Message-ID: <1338367487.8834.128.camel@sokoban> References: <1336990730-26892-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1336990730-26892-15-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <871umj4qnl.fsf@ti.com> <1337593097.28274.19.camel@sokoban> <87pq9mg2w4.fsf@ti.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:51539 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932272Ab2E3Iox (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 04:44:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Menon, Nishanth" Cc: Kevin Hilman , paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Benoit Cousson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 15:48 -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Tero Kristo writes: > > > >> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 17:06 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >>> +Benoit > >>> > >>> Tero Kristo writes: > >>> > >>> > save_secure_all needs l3_main_3_ick and l4_secure_clkdm enabled, > >>> > otherwise the secure ROM code will crash. > >>> > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo > >>> > >>> I think I mentioned this already (I'm already lost in what I've said for > >>> thisseries), but I don't think the secure RAM stuff belongs in the > >>> wakeupgen driver. > >> > >> As mentioned, save_secure_all saves: > >> - secure RAM > >> - GIC registers > >> - some other mysterious stuff > >> > >> Attempting to do separate saves for secure RAM + GIC hang the device > >> during wakeup, in addition to being really inefficient (secure API calls > >> are expensive.) > > > > I guess my comment wasn't that this isn't needed, but that it doesn't > > seem to belong in the wakeupgen base (which should probably converted > > into a real driver.) > > > > Seems better to have this stuff in the secure code, maybe omap-secure.c? > > > > Perhaps OFF mode notifier might help best here. In addition - it might > be safer to protect all calls with clkdm_wakeup around > secure_dispatcher instead of just the save_secure_all.. ROM code is > not smart enough around it. > an completely safe version used by security driver can be found here: > http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=blob;f=security/smc/tf_comm_mshield.c;h=b5279fef0fa400438a57b3941af13d965e983bf0;hb=p-android-omap-3.0#l253 > Thats true... the secure driver in mainline kernel is rather a stub. Previous version of this patch actually had clkdm_wakeup around every call to dispatcher, I just optimized it away. I can add it back in the next version if you think that is better. -Tero