From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: OMAP: core/hwmod: first set of fixes for 3.5-rc Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:36:29 +0300 Message-ID: <1339659389.2091.153.camel@sokoban> References: <20120607060901.25532.68354.stgit@dusk> <1339162255.2091.56.camel@sokoban> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:39316 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910Ab2FNHgf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:36:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Hilman , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 17:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Tero, > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > Tested this set on top of v3.5-rc1 with omap3 / omap4 suspend + my omap4 > > core retention / dev-off patches. There are a couple of minor issues, > > like the bug in patch 5, and the fact that counter_32k hwmod data is > > broken for omap4. This fix is needed on omap4 to fix the counter_32k, if > > this is not done, device off does not work: > > Thanks for the testing and the reminder. Will send the next version of > this soon to address more comments from Tony. I also tested the v2 with my last dev-off branch and it works perfectly without any additional hwmod related tweaks. -Tero