From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: Beagle: fix TFP410 powerdown GPIO init Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:20:59 +0300 Message-ID: <1339662059.2229.8.camel@deskari> References: <1339579215-24098-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <1339658290.2236.5.camel@deskari> <1339661613.2229.6.camel@deskari> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eOqJUgZD8+1RxqyQKhag" Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.205]:47111 "EHLO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755307Ab2FNIVF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 04:21:05 -0400 Received: by lbom4 with SMTP id m4so1916677lbo.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:21:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russ Dill Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Robert Nelson , Jason Kridner --=-eOqJUgZD8+1RxqyQKhag Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 01:17 -0700, Russ Dill wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen w= rote: > > Okay. These are a bit problematic, because we're in the process of > > removing these kinds of things from the board file, as they cannot be > > supported with device tree. The tfp410 driver in v3.5 doesn't even have > > the platform_enable/disable callback anymore. > > > > Those do not belong to tfp410 driver, but I don't really know how they > > should be handled. This is one of the questions about device tree that > > is unclear to me... >=20 >=20 > Are you talking about the AUX_3V3_DIS pin? The boardfile currently > just initializes that low, that should be too much of a problem to put > into DT, or if someone is so inclined assign it to a regulator via DT. Ah, sorry. You are right. The only gpio handled in the platform_enable/disable calls is the power-down gpio, and that is handled by the tfp410 driver properly. So there shouldn't be a problem there. Tomi --=-eOqJUgZD8+1RxqyQKhag Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP2Z7rAAoJEPo9qoy8lh714voQAJS3pdZ2OlhfEoYMk+IWOkNP pxdioK3fspRZtgu0IrWMYEb0GhWxxr2tH1FLTXG2IiOzx7FD7T/2UhZCRj/BtwgN ypxtmz3Eu+ckeeyME6UQ3mh7enUJO2mfGarEz1bm8RhlYC2MIuYHrxbpocL6BUMn WxYcDoeLXEbSrTCqundKp57yDVQI781HndKrbNOIXVhgFuswUM2G/rhwKC5KP5SD qNd77msdsBIjdHZumsAvknOUHgyTleEDTkXMHDFn4mfVSmiq9UF9je9LWPJ5GlwB VCgm+8lALGkPOfICYONJdMTaXNdxRFXCwvkEfffPxjmbvnnUyyVH/MPruh1Zv23h ljD9lnHghgj5+6pGvvODw2fDHge+1iA+DbukNMy6RJMZ58V0rOG0C/PN9hVJMxBA HGuoPtSdn7PYjsr+OucDZWbvpfi0BCFiEyzCyl+mTTOE86QEk/ULLMvHGvRDWPkM M3F6QqymjOYGimrGCW+0NoJCj1r33k1GU6BAJwEyCUAMuW0bLhlryLhhXinIn6Md a/8KZv54zrU5B4wNeze4xnqoY1bVb7PgvZDQCcZVhZ5V7s+zk+TnhgNwS+Mp0dFY XUvQOAdz0AIgRs3Sgl3BKQ+i5INny7LsEInHvLZINV99U1KdSr/seY4EgvLVEFWZ Q0Yl7XEbhh06stCXwNnC =0wqd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eOqJUgZD8+1RxqyQKhag--