Re: [PATCH 09/17] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts

Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-14T11:20:17Z

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:20:42PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> According to flow diagrams on OMAP TRMs,
> we should ACK the IRQ as they happen.

You don't explain that you're adding a new dev_err() statement into the
driver for a missing acknowledge.

What if you're probing for a device - can this cause spam to the kernel
console? What if you have protocol mangling enabled with the "ignore
lack of ack bit set" ?

>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index f978b14..c00ba7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -894,21 +894,20 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
> }
>
> complete:
> - /*
> - * Ack the stat in one go, but [R/X]DR and [R/X]RDY should be
> - * acked after the data operation is complete.
> - * Ref: TRM SWPU114Q Figure 18-31
> - */
> - omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG, stat &
> - ~(OMAP_I2C_STAT_RRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_RDR |
> - OMAP_I2C_STAT_XRDY | OMAP_I2C_STAT_XDR));
> -
> - if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK)
> + if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK) {
> + dev_err(dev->dev, "No Acknowledge\n");
> err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK;
> + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK);
> + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
>
> if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL) {
> dev_err(dev->dev, "Arbitration lost\n");
> err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL;
> + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_NACK);
> + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -989,12 +988,18 @@ complete:
>
> if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR) {
> dev_err(dev->dev, "Receive overrun\n");
> - dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR;
> + err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR;
> + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_ROVR);
> + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> if (stat & OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF) {
> dev_err(dev->dev, "Transmit underflow\n");
> - dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF;
> + err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF;
> + omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF);
> + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> } while (stat);
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel