From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:40:58 +0300 Message-ID: <1347522058.10702.143.camel@sokoban> References: <1342704392-23657-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1342704392-23657-8-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1342711907.4672.153.camel@sokoban> <87sjamsuom.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:51800 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306Ab2IMHlG (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:41:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sjamsuom.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:11 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Paul Walmsley writes: > > [...] > > > > > It kind of looks to me like there are two or three separate sets within > > the series. My feeling is that Kevin should take the first two, then I > > should take the rest other than 6 and 7. Then once those are queued, > > we can pull in 6 and 7. Does that make sense to you? > > > > Looks like 1, 2 & 7 are needed for OSWR, and the rest can go now via > Paul. > > Tero, can create a new OSWR series including 1, 2 & 7? Can you also > refresh it against Jean's latest functional power state series (v6)? Yes, I already have these patches locally available. I'll just refresh them against Paul's minor tweaks on rest of the patches and re-post. -Tero